Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
It is important to capture the patient experience with a diabetes treatment in clinical trials; however, use of instruments to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in diabetes trials is inconsistent and results may not be reported alongside primary efficacy data. In lieu of head-to-head data, indirect comparisons can be used to compare competing interventions. In this study, we used indirect comparison methods to assess differences in PRO score changes between canagliflozin and other antihyperglycemic agents as add-on to metformin.Methods
Literature searches were performed to identify studies that reported the same PRO instruments that were collected across four trials of canagliflozin in dual or triple therapy. Extensive searches identified only one study t
SUBMITTER: Traina SB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5801229 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature