Dataset Information

Effect of corticosteroids on atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore the effect of corticosteroids on atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for published articles describing the effect of corticosteroids in preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Data on study and patient were extracted. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by use of a random-effect model, and P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three cohort studies involving 846 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Within one month of catheter ablation, corticosteroid use was associated with a declined risk of recurrence of AF in RCT (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.85, P=0.005), but without significant effect in cohort studies (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.30, P=0.94). After three months of catheter ablation, corticosteroids did not have a significant effect in the prevention of late recurrence of AF in either RCT (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.59, P=0.49) or cohort studies (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.31, P=0.78).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis suggested that periprocedural administration of corticosteroids of catheter ablation was associated with reduction of early but not late recurrence of AF.

SUBMITTER: Jaiswal S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5802978 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan.

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of corticosteroids on atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a meta-analysis.

Jaiswal Sanjay S Liu Xian-Bao XB Wei Qu-Cheng QC Sun Ying-Hao YH Wang Li-Han LH Song Liu-Guang LG Yang Dan-Dan DD Wang Jian-An JA

Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 20180101 1

<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore the effect of corticosteroids on atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for published articles describing the effect of corticosteroids in preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Data on study and patient were extracted. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by use of a random-e ...[more]

PMID: 29308608

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionCatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently performed cardiac ablation procedure worldwide. The majority of ablations can now be performed safely with minimal radiation exposure or even without the use of fluoroscopy, thanks to advances in 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems and/or intracardiac echocardiography. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of zero fluoroscopy (ZF) versus non-zero fluoroscopy (NZF) strategies for AF ablation procedures.MethodsElectronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing procedural parameters and outcomes of ZF vs. NZF approaches in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. We used a random-effects model to derive the mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsOur meta-analysis included seven studies comprising 1,593 patients. The ZF approach was found to be feasible in 95.1% of patients. Compared to the NZF approach, the ZF approach significantly reduced procedure time [mean difference (MD): -9.11 min (95% CI: -12.93 to -5.30 min; p < 0.01)], fluoroscopy time [MD: -5.21 min (95% CI: -5.51 to -4.91 min; p < 0.01)], and fluoroscopy dose [MD: -3.96 mGy (95% CI: -4.27 to -3.64; p < 0.01)]. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of total ablation time [MD: -104.26 s (95% CI: -183.37 to -25.14; p = 0.12)]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the acute [risk ratio (RR): 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02; p = 0.72] and long-term success rates (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90-1.03; p = 0.56) between the ZF and NZF methods. The complication rate was 2.76% in the entire study population and did not differ between the groups (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.41-2.15; p = 0.89).ConclusionThe ZF approach is a feasible method for AF ablation procedures. It significantly reduces procedure time and radiation exposure without compromising the acute and long-term success rates or complication rates.

Project description:BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for cognitive dysfunction. Although catheter ablation (CA) is one of the main treatments for AF, whether it can improve cognitive function in patients with AF remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the cognitive outcome post-CA procedure.MethodsTwo investigators independently searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases from inception to September 2021 for all the potentially eligible studies. The outcomes of interest included dementia or cognitive disorder through scoring or recognized classification criteria. Heterogeneity was determined by using Cochrane's Q test and calculating the I 2. A random-effects model was used to incorporate the potential effects of heterogeneity. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the methodological quality of each included study, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method was adopted to evaluate the quality of evidence.ResultThirteen studies including 40,868 patients were included, among which 12,086 patients received AF ablation. Meta-analysis indicated that patients with AF ablation had a lower risk of dementia incidence in comparison to patients with AF without ablation [hazard ratio (HR): 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.84, p = 0.003 I 2 = 40%]. Significant differences were observed in the incidence of new-onset dementia [risk ratio (RR): 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.65, p < 0.0001 I 2 = 84%]; the changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score [weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.00, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.64, p < 0.005 I 2 = 0%] and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (WMD: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.26, p < 0.00001 I 2 = 0%]. However, in subgroup analysis, we did not observe significant changes in MoCA score at < 3 months (WMD: 1.20, 95% CI: -0.19 to 2.58, p = 0.09 I 2 = 50%) and changes in cognitive function scores between the radiofrequency group and cryoballoon group [standard mean difference (SMD): 0.39, 95% CI: -0.47 to 1.24, p = 0.38 I 2 = 87%]. The NOS indicated that included studies were moderate to high quality, while the quality of evidence assessed by GRADE was low in 2 and very low in 2.ConclusionWe analyzed the related cognitive outcomes after AF ablation. In the overall population, AF ablation had a positive trend for improving cognitive function at >3 months post-procedure. However, AF ablation might not be related to the improvement of cognitive function at < 3 months.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021285198.

Project description:AimsAlthough several studies have proved that repeat catheter ablation is beneficial to recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT)/atrial fibrillation (AF) after AF catheter ablation, the hard endpoints of the effect of catheter ablation on recurrent AT/AF patients after AF catheter ablation remains unclear. Our study aims to compare the effect of catheter ablation and drug therapy on recurrent AT/AF patients after AF catheter ablation.Methods and resultsFour thousand nine hundred and thirteen consecutive patients with recurrent AT/AF after catheter ablation from the China-AF registry were enrolled. The patients were divided into two study groups: the repeat catheter ablation group and the medical therapy group. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular mortality or ischaemic stroke or major bleeding events. Secondary endpoints were each component of the primary endpoints and AF recurrence rate. Landmark analysis and Cox regression were used in the statistical analysis. We chose landmark 36 months as the primary landmark date. Over a median follow-up period of 40 ± 24 months, 4913 patients were divided into either the repeat ablation group or the medical therapy group. The cumulative incidence of the composite primary outcome was significantly lower in the repeat ablation group than the medical therapy group (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.89; P = 0.015) of landmark 36 months (2359 patients were included in medical therapy group and 704 patients were included in repeat ablation group at landmark 36 months). However, all secondary endpoints were not statistically different in the two groups, including cardiovascular mortality, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding events, and AF recurrence rate.ConclusionBased on this research, in recurrent AT/AF patients after a catheter ablation procedure, compared with medical therapy, repeat catheter ablation may significantly reduce the risk of the endpoint of composite cardiovascular mortality, ischaemic stroke, and major bleeding events.

Dataset Information

Effect of corticosteroids on atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a meta-analysis.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effect of corticosteroids on atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets