Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Winning funding for health and medical research usually involves a lengthy application process. With success rates under 20%, much of the time spent by 80% of applicants could have been better used on actual research. An alternative funding system that could save time is using democracy to award the most deserving researchers based on votes from the research community. We aimed to pilot how such a system could work and examine some potential biases.

Methods

We used an online survey with a convenience sample of Australian researchers. Researchers were asked to name the 10 scientists currently working in Australia that they thought most deserved funding for future research. For comparison, we used recent winners from large national fellowship schemes that used tradi

SUBMITTER: Barnett AG 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5803583 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature