Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The record high 42 model accuracy estimation methods were tested in CASP12. The paper presents results of the assessment of these methods in the whole-model and per-residue accuracy modes. Scores from four different model evaluation packages were used as the "ground truth" for assessing accuracy of methods' estimates. They include a rigid-body score-GDT_TS, and three local-structure based scores-LDDT, CAD and SphereGrinder. The ability of methods to identify best models from among several available, predict model's absolute accuracy score, distinguish between good and bad models, predict accuracy of the coordinate error self-estimates, and discriminate between reliable and unreliable regions in the models was assessed. Single-model methods advanced to the point where they are better than c
SUBMITTER: Kryshtafovych A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5816721 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA