State-dependent judgement bias in Drosophila: evidence for evolutionarily primitive affective processes.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Affective states influence decision-making under ambiguity in humans and other animals. Individuals in a negative state tend to interpret ambiguous cues more negatively than individuals in a positive state. We demonstrate that the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, also exhibits state-dependent changes in cue interpretation. Drosophila were trained on a Go/Go task to approach a positive (P) odour associated with a sugar reward and actively avoid a negative (N) odour associated with shock. Trained flies were then either shaken to induce a purported negative state or left undisturbed (control), and given a choice between: air or P; air or N; air or ambiguous odour (1 : 1 blend of P : N). Shaken flies were significantly less likely to approach the ambiguous odour than control f
SUBMITTER: Deakin A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5830672 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA