Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.


ABSTRACT:

Importance

Active surveillance is recommended for patients with very low-risk (VLR) and low-risk (LR) prostate cancer. Despite controversy, recent clinical guidelines state surveillance may be considered for men with low-volume intermediate-risk (LVIR) disease.

Objective

To compare rates of adverse pathologic findings among VLR, LR, and LVIR men electing immediate radical prostatectomy and evaluate criteria to define if a favorable intermediate-risk group minimizing risk exists.

Design, setting, and participants

This was a cohort study of men (2005-July 2016) with clinically localized VLR (1264 patients), LR (4849 patients), and LVIR (608 patients) (1-2 cores, Gleason 3?+?4?=?7, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level <20 ng/mL) prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy evaluated retrospectively at Johns Hopkins Hospital.

Interventions

Radical prostatectomy.

Main outcomes and measures

The proportions of men found to have at least Gleason 4?+?3?=?7 disease and other adverse pathologic features were compared by risk group. Log-binomial regression calculated relative risk (RR) of adverse pathologic findings in the LVIR cohort compared with VLR and LR cohorts. Analyses were repeated in subgroups of the LVIR population who otherwise met criteria for VLR (T1c, PSA density [PSAD] <0.15 ng/mL/cm3, ?50% cancer in any core) and LR (?T2a, PSA level <10 ng/mL) disease. Rates of adverse pathologic findings within the LVIR group were calculated based on various clinical thresholds, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of adverse pathologic findings.

Results

The rate of adverse pathologic findings was significantly higher for LVIR disease (150 of 608 patients [24.7%]; RR, 4.50; 95% CI, 3.73-5.43; P?Conclusions and relevanceNearly 25% of men (150 of 608) electing immediate radical prostatectomy with low-volume, Gleason 3?+?4 prostate cancer on biopsy are found to harbor adverse surgical pathologic findings. These data do not support the presence of a "favorable" subgroup among included patients and could have important implications for active surveillance in similar patients with Gleason 3?+?4?=?7 prostate cancer.

SUBMITTER: Patel HD 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5833628 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.

Patel Hiten D HD   Tosoian Jeffrey J JJ   Carter H Ballentine HB   Epstein Jonathan I JI  

JAMA oncology 20180101 1


<h4>Importance</h4>Active surveillance is recommended for patients with very low-risk (VLR) and low-risk (LR) prostate cancer. Despite controversy, recent clinical guidelines state surveillance may be considered for men with low-volume intermediate-risk (LVIR) disease.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare rates of adverse pathologic findings among VLR, LR, and LVIR men electing immediate radical prostatectomy and evaluate criteria to define if a favorable intermediate-risk group minimizing risk exists.<h  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5944136 | biostudies-literature