Dataset Information

Braiding Two Evidence-based Programs for Families at-risk: Results of a Cluster Randomized Trial.

ABSTRACT: Child maltreatment is a significant public health problem best addressed through evidence-based parent-support programs. There is a wide range of programs with different strengths offering a variety of options for families. Choosing one single evidence-based program often limits the range of services available to meet the unique needs of families. This paper presents findings from a study to examine the systematic braiding of two evidence-based programs, Parents as Teachers and SafeCare at Home (PATSCH), with the goal to provide a more robust intervention for higher risk families. A cluster randomized effectiveness trial was conducted to examine if PATSCH improved parenting behaviors known to decrease the risk for child maltreatment compared to Parents as Teachers (PAT) Alone. Parents (N= 159; 92 PAT Alone; 67 PATSCH) were enrolled to complete a baseline, 6-month and 12-month assessment. Results indicate the groups did not differ on number of environmental hazards in the home, parents' health care decision-making abilities, child abuse potential, and physical assault over time. However, with regard to the potential for child abuse, the PATSCH group showed a decrease in nonviolence discipline and increase in psychological aggression compared to the PAT group. Further research is needed to better examine this concept and its implications for the field.

SUBMITTER: Guastaferro K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5847301 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Braiding Two Evidence-based Programs for Families at-risk: Results of a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Guastaferro Kate K Lai Betty S BS Miller Katy K Chatham Jenelle Shanley JS Whitaker Daniel J DJ Self-Brown Shannon S Kemner Allison A Lutzker John R JR

Journal of child and family studies 20171220 2

Child maltreatment is a significant public health problem best addressed through evidence-based parent-support programs. There is a wide range of programs with different strengths offering a variety of options for families. Choosing one single evidence-based program often limits the range of services available to meet the unique needs of families. This paper presents findings from a study to examine the systematic braiding of two evidence-based programs, Parents as Teachers and SafeCare at Home ...[more]

PMID: 29540976

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAntisocial behavior and adult criminality often have origins in childhood and are best addressed early in the child's life using evidence-based parenting programs. However, families with additional risk factors do not always make sufficient changes while attending such programs; these families may benefit from additional support.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of adding a 10-session, structured home parent support (HPS) intervention to enhance outcomes for high-risk families attending the Incredible Years Parent (IYP) program.Design, setting, and participantsA randomized clinical superiority trial of 126 parents of children aged 3 to 7 years with conduct problems compared the IYP program plus HPS with treatment as usual of the IYP program alone. Child behavior measures were collected before and after treatment and at the 6-month follow-up. Recruitment from 19 IYP groups began February 13, 2013, and follow-up data collection was completed June 4, 2015. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat design with last observation carried forward. Statistical analysis took place from May 20, 2015, to March 31, 2016.InterventionParents were randomly assigned to receive IYP program plus HPS or IYP alone.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome measure was the posttreatment change in Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory Total Problem Scale (ECBI-P) score. Secondary outcomes included maintenance of change on the ECBI-P score, ECBI Intensity Scale score, and Social Competence Scale score at the 6-month follow-up; percentage of child behavior scores in the clinical range after treatment; retention; and attendance.ResultsA total of 126 parents (112 women and 14 men; mean [SD] age, 34.7 [8.4] years) were included; 63 parents were randomly assigned to each intervention group. Analysis of variance using intention to treat showed no significant difference between groups after treatment (P = .62). At follow-up, there was a medium effect (d = 0.63) showing a significant benefit from IYP plus HPS of 3.6 (95% CI, 0.8-6.5) on the ECBI-P score (F1,124 = 6.3; P = .01). Families receiving the IYP plus HPS intervention had significantly fewer children with child behavior scores in the clinical range after treatment (9 of 51 [17.6%]) compared with families receiving the IYP program alone (18 of 45 [40.0%]), and this status was maintained at follow-up. The HPS intervention had better retention than the IYP program (dropout, 7 [5.6%] vs 16 [12.7%]) as well as better attendance.Conclusions and relevanceIn this trial, the IYP plus HPS intervention significantly improved outcomes for the most vulnerable families at 6 months. This study demonstrated that the HPS intervention is an effective addition to the IYP program to improve engagement and implementation of IYP program strategies and enhance child behavior outcomes for the most vulnerable families.Trial registrationhttp://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12612000878875.

Project description:BackgroundCommunity organizations can have difficulty implementing evidence-based prevention programs. More research is needed on implementation support interventions designed to help these organizations implement programs with quality.MethodsPreparing to Run Effective Programs (PREP) is a randomized controlled trial testing Getting To Outcomes (GTO), a 2-year implementation support intervention. It compares 15 Boys and Girls Club sites implementing CHOICE (control group), a five-session evidence-based alcohol and drug prevention program, with 14 similar sites implementing CHOICE supported by GTO (intervention group). PREP replicates a previous GTO study that had the same design, but featured a teen pregnancy prevention program instead. All sites received typical CHOICE training. Fourteen intervention sites received GTO manuals, training, and onsite technical assistance to help practitioners complete implementation best practices specified by GTO (i.e., GTO steps). During the first year, technical assistance providers helped the intervention group adopt, plan, and deliver CHOICE. Then, this group was trained on evaluation and quality improvement steps of GTO using feedback reports summarizing their own data, which yielded revised plans for subsequent implementation of CHOICE. This paper presents results regarding GTO's impact on CHOICE fidelity (adherence, quality of delivery, dosage) and the proximal outcomes of the youth participants (aged 10-14)-attitudes and intentions regarding cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana use. Fidelity was assessed at all sites by observer ratings and attendance logs. Proximal outcomes were assessed via survey at baseline, 3, and 6 months.ResultsAfter 1 year, fidelity and proximal outcomes were similar between Intervention and control groups. After 2 years (which included GTO quality improvement activities that took place between years 1 and 2), intervention sites had higher ratings of CHOICE adherence and quality of delivery (dosage remained similar). Proximal outcomes did not differ between groups in either year, although there was universally high endorsement of prosocial responses to those outcomes from the start.ConclusionsFindings suggest that systematic implementation support provided by GTO can help community organizations achieve better fidelity. Findings replicate the implementation results from a previous GTO study using the same design, but with a different evidence-based program and different fidelity measures. Although proximal outcomes did not change, in large part due to ceiling effects, the implementation findings suggest GTO can support a variety of programs.Trial registrationThis project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02135991 . The trial was first registered on May 12, 2014.

Project description:BackgroundOver 5000 community anti-drug coalitions operating in the USA serve as a cornerstone of federal drug prevention. These coalitions, however, have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing substance use only when they use technical assistance (TA) and implement evidence-based programs (EBPs). The absence of TA and EBP implementation by coalitions is a key research-to-practice gap. The Coalition Check-Up TA system is designed to fill this gap by supporting community coalition implementation of EBPs. Existing TA models for evidence-based coalition approaches are resource intensive and coalition model specific. The Coalition Check-Up is a lower cost strategy that works with a variety of types of coalitions to support sustainable implementation of EBPs. This study protocol describes a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial applying Wandersman's Interactive Systems Framework to test the effects of the Coalition Check-Up on coalition EBP implementation capacity and outcomes. The Interactive Systems Framework outlines how the prevention support system-especially TA-bolsters EBP dissemination and implementation.MethodsUsing a cluster randomized controlled design, this trial will test the overall effectiveness of the Coalition Check-Up, including how it contributes to EBP implementation and prevention of youth substance use. The first aim is to estimate the impact of the Coalition Check-Up on coalitions' capacity to do their work. We will recruit 68 anti-drug coalitions for random assignment to the Coalition Check-Up or "TA as usual" condition. We will evaluate whether the Coalition Check-Up improves coalition capacity using measures of coalition member responses about team processes, coalition network composition, and collaborative structure. Our second aim is to estimate the impact of the Coalition Check-Up on implementation of EBPs, and our third aim is to estimate the impact of the Coalition Check-Up on youth substance use.DiscussionThis project will clarify how the Coalition Check-Up, a scalable approach to TA due to its low cost, affects coalition capacity to support EBP implementation. Analyses also provide insight into causal pathways from the prevention support system to the prevention delivery system outlined by the Interactive Systems Framework. Results will build the evidence-base for how to support community coalitions' sustainable implementation of evidence-based prevention programs and policies.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT04592120 . Registered on October 19, 2020.

Project description:Trachoma control programs utilize mass azithromycin distributions to treat ocular Chlamydia trachomatis as part of an effort to eliminate this disease world-wide. But it remains unclear what the community-level risk factors are for infection.This cluster-randomized, controlled trial entered 48 randomly selected communities in a 2×2 factorial design evaluating the effect of different treatment frequencies and treatment coverage levels. A pretreatment census and examination established the prevalence of risk factors for clinical trachoma and ocular chlamydia infection including years of education of household head, distance to primary water source, presence of household latrine, and facial cleanliness (ocular discharge, nasal discharge, and presence of facial flies). Univariate and multivariate associations were tested using linear regression and Bayes model averaging.There were a total of 24,536 participants (4,484 children aged 0-5 years) in 6,235 households in the study. Before treatment in May to July 2010, the community-level prevalence of active trachoma (TF or TI utilizing the World Health Organization [WHO] grading system) was 26.0% (95% CI: 21.9% to 30.0%) and the mean community-level prevalence of chlamydia infection by Amplicor PCR was 20.7% (95% CI: 16.5% to 24.9%) in children aged 0-5 years. Univariate analysis showed that nasal discharge (0.29, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.54; P?=?0.03), presence of flies on the face (0.40, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.64; P?=?0.001), and years of formal education completed by the head of household (0.07, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.13; P?=?0.03) were independent risk factors for chlamydia infection. In multivariate analysis, facial flies (0.26, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.49; P?=?0.03) and years of formal education completed by the head of household (0.06, 95% CI: 0.008 to 0.11; P?=?0.02) were associated risk factors for ocular chlamydial infection.We have found that the presence of facial flies and years of education of the head of the household are risk factors for chlamydia infection when the analysis is done at the community level.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00792922.

Dataset Information

Braiding Two Evidence-based Programs for Families at-risk: Results of a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Publications

Braiding Two Evidence-based Programs for Families at-risk: Results of a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets