Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Most recent models conceptualize working memory (WM) as a continuous resource, divided up according to task demands. When an increasing number of items need to be remembered, each item receives a smaller chunk of the memory resource. These models predict that the allocation of attention to high-priority WM items during the retention interval should be a zero-sum game: improvements in remembering cued items come at the expense of uncued items because resources are dynamically transferred from uncued to cued representations. The current study provides empirical data challenging this model. Four precision retrocueing WM experiments assessed cued and uncued items on every trial. This permitted a test for trade-off of the memory resource. We found no evidence for trade-offs in memory across tri
SUBMITTER: Myers NE
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5868459 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA