Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) in 2017.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Saif MW
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5870128 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) in 2017.
JOP : Journal of the pancreas 20171130 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundNeuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms, with an estimated annual incidence of ~ 6.9/100,000. NETs arise throughout the body from cells of the diffuse endocrine system. More than half originate from endocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas, thus being referred to as gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP NETs). The only treatment that offers a cure is surgery, however most patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease, and curative surgery is usually not an option.Since the majority of patients are not candidate for curative surgery, they can be offered long-term systemic treatment, for both symptomatic relief and tumor growth suppression. Evidence based treatment options include somatostatin analogues, everolimus (an mTOR inhibitor), sunitinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), chemotherapy, etc., alone or combined with cytoreductive procedures (surgery or liver directed procedures). However, there is an increasing need for novel therapies. Other treatment options being investigated are immunotherapy and epigenetic assessment that may lead to more personalized interventions. Following first line therapy with somatostatin analogues, there is no clear information to date indicating a preferred treatment sequence, and therefore the treatment approach should be individualized based on each NET patient characteristics.ConclusionsNET patients are increasingly diagnosed throughout the world, usually with metastatic disease and requiring systemic therapy. We believe that each patient should be therefore thoroughly evaluated and individually discussed by a multidisciplinary and dedicated NET-expert team, updated with all treatment options including ongoing clinical trials, and before selecting the proper treatment sequence.
| S-EPMC6042326 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors presenting a wide spectrum of different clinical and biological characteristics. In these tumors, the histological evaluation is a crucial element of clinical management. Currently, tumor grading, determined by Ki-67 staining and mitotic counts, is the most reliable predictor of prognosis. This scoring method is time-consuming and a high reproducibility cannot be achieved. Novel approaches are needed to support histological evaluation and prognosis. In this study, starting from a microarray analysis, we defined the miRNAs signature for poorly differentiated NETs (G3) compared to well differentiated NETs (G1 and G2) consisting of 56 deregulated miRNAs. Moreover, we identified 8 miRNAs that were expressed in all GEP-NETs grades but at different level. Among these miRNAs, we found miR-96-5p that raised its expression levels from grade 1 to grade 3; inversely, its target FOXO1 was decrease from grade 1 to grade 3. Our results reveal that the miRNAs expression profile of GEP-NET correlates their expression with grading showing a potential advantage of miRNA quantification to aid clinicians in the classification of common GEP-NETs subtypes.
2020-08-04 | GSE135034 | GEO
Project description:Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms mostly originating from the gastroenteropancreatic tract (GEP-NETs). Data regarding nutritional status in GEP-NET patients are limited. The aim of the study was to investigate the nutritional status and adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD) in GEP-NET patients and to correlate them with tumor aggressiveness. A cross-sectional case-control observational study was conducted enrolling 83 patients with well-differentiated G1/G2 GEP-NETs after resection, as well as 83 healthy subjects, age, sex and body mass index-matched. Nutritional status was assessed by evaluating with Bioelectrical Impedance analysis and its phase angle (PhA), adherence to the MD according to PREDIMED score, dietary assessment, anthropometric parameters, and clinico-pathological characteristics. GEP-NET patients consumed less frequently vegetables, fruits, wine, fish/seafood, nuts, and more frequently red/processed meats, butter, cream, margarine, and soda drinks than controls. Patients with more aggressive disease presented a lower adherence to MD according to PREDIMED categories in comparison to G1, localized and free/stable disease status. A smaller PhA value and a lower PREDIMED score were significantly correlated with G2 tumor, metastases, and progressive disease. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting an association between nutritional status and tumor aggressiveness in a selected group of GEP-NETs. Moreover, higher intakes of food of MD, may represent a potential tool for prevention of tumor aggressiveness. Thus, a skilled nutritionist should be an integral part of the multidisciplinary management of GEP-NET patients.
| S-EPMC6316835 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Simple Summary This comprehensive review explores evolving systemic combination regimens for advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) with evidence provided by clinical trials and prospective studies. Phase 1 and 2 trials predominated, with few phase 3 trials impacting clinical practice. Results showed variability in anti-tumor activity of combination regimens, with some showing promising outcomes. Among others, treatments with a peptide receptor radionuclide therapy backbone displayed favorable results and warrant further investigation. In contrast, immune-checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations had limited applicability in this patient population. More extensive trials are needed to determine optimal treatment strategies. Abstract There is an evolving landscape of systemic combination regimens for patients with advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). In this review, we provide a comprehensive outline of the existing clinical trials/prospective studies investigating these combinations. PubMed was searched using key relevant terms to identify articles referring to GEP-NETs and combination treatments. No systematic search of the literature or metanalysis of the data was performed, and we focused on the most recent literature results. Primarily, phase 1 and 2 clinical trials were available, with a smaller number of phase 3 trials, reporting results from combination treatments across a wide range of antiproliferative agents. We identified significant variability in the anti-tumor activity of the reported combinations, with occasional promising results, but only a very small number of practice-changing phase 3 clinical trials. Overall, the peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)-based combinations (with chemotherapy, dual PPRT, and targeted agents) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent combinations with standard chemotherapy were found to have favorable results and may be worth investigating in future, larger-scale trials. In contrast, the immune-checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations were found to have limited applicability in advanced, well-differentiated GEP-NETs.
| S-EPMC10452098 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The increased incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) over the past few decades has been accompanied by an improvement in overall survival. There are differences in the management of small bowel NETs versus pNETs. The management of all patients with NETs must be individualized based on patient characteristics as well tumor-related factors. This article reviews the role of somatostatin analogues, historical results with chemotherapy in gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEPNETs), and more recent evidence for the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in GEPNETs. The article also discusses molecular targeted therapies approved for use in GEPNETs and some ongoing clinical trials.
| S-EPMC7700751 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThere is a lack of data on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of lanreotide autogel in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) of Chinese ethnicity. This noninterventional, retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of lanreotide autogel in patients of Chinese ethnicity with GEP-NETs in clinical practice.MethodsPatients' charts were abstracted from five hospitals in Hong Kong and Taiwan (July-September 2021), where lanreotide autogel is approved for treating GEP-NETs. Included patients were adults with unresectable, metastatic, or locally advanced GEP-NETs who received a first injection (index) of lanreotide autogel 120 mg between 01 January 2017 and 30 June 2020 (planned sample size: N = 30). Follow-up ran from index to a maximum of 48 (± 4) weeks or until disease progression, start of new antitumor treatment, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at week 48 (±4), and secondary endpoints included PFS rate at week 24 (±4), estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. All analyses were descriptive.ResultsOf 27 patients enrolled, 22 (81.5%) had 48 weeks of follow-up. Tumors of pancreatic origin were the most common (73.9%). PFS rate was 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.72 - 0.99) at 24 weeks and 0.82 (0.53-0.94) at 48 weeks. Overall, 74.1% patients experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event; none were serious. No deaths were reported.ConclusionsLanreotide autogel was well tolerated and showed good tumor control rate in a real-world setting. These findings align with results from previous studies in Caucasian, Japanese, and Korean patients, thus supporting lanreotide autogel for treating patients with GEP-NETs of Chinese ethnicity.
| S-EPMC11880440 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are an increasingly common cause of neoplastic diseases. One of the largest groups of NENs are neoplasms localized to the gastroenteropancreatic system, which are known as gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs). Because of nonspecific clinical symptoms, GEP-NEN patient diagnosis and, consequently, their treatment, might be difficult and delayed. This situation has forced researchers all over the world to continue progress in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with GEP-NENs. Our review is designed to present the latest reports on the laboratory diagnostic techniques, imaging tests and surgical and nonsurgical treatment strategies used for patients with these rare neoplasms. We paid particular attention to the nuclear approach, the use of which has been applied to GEP-NEN patient diagnosis, and to nonsurgical and radionuclide treatment strategies. Recent publications were reviewed in search of reports on new strategies for effective disease management. Attention was also paid to those studies still in progress, but with successful results. A total of 248 papers were analyzed, from which 141 papers most relevant to the aim of the study were selected. Using these papers, we highlight the progress in the development of diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with GEP-NENs.
| S-EPMC9030061 | biostudies-literature
Project description:microRNA profiling in different grading of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs)
| PRJNA557200 | ENA
Project description:These guidelines update previous guidance published in 2005. They have been revised by a group who are members of the UK and Ireland Neuroendocrine Tumour Society with endorsement from the clinical committees of the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Society for Endocrinology, the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (and its Surgical Specialty Associations), the British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology and others. The authorship represents leaders of the various groups in the UK and Ireland Neuroendocrine Tumour Society, but a large amount of work has been carried out by other specialists, many of whom attended a guidelines conference in May 2009. We have attempted to represent this work in the acknowledgements section. Over the past few years, there have been advances in the management of neuroendocrine tumours, which have included clearer characterisation, more specific and therapeutically relevant diagnosis, and improved treatments. However, there remain few randomised trials in the field and the disease is uncommon, hence all evidence must be considered weak in comparison with other more common cancers.
| S-EPMC3280861 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeGEP-NENs are rare malignancies with increasing incidence. Their molecular characteristics are still undefined. We explored the underlying biology of GEP-NENs and the differences between gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatic (PNEN), high-grade (HG), and low-grade (LG) tumors.Experimental designGEP-NENs were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS; MiSeq on 47 genes, NextSeq on 592 genes), IHC, and in situ hybridization. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated on the basis of somatic nonsynonymous missense mutations, and microsatellite instability (MSI) was evaluated by NGS of known MSI loci.ResultsIn total, 724 GEP-NENs were examined: GI (N = 469), PNEN (N = 255), HG (N = 135), and LG (N = 335). Forty-nine percent were female, and median age was 59. Among LG tumors, the most frequently mutated genes were ATRX (13%), ARID1A (10%), and MEN1 (10%). HG tumors showed TP53 (51%), KRAS (30%), APC (27%), and ARID1A (23%). Immune-related biomarkers yielded a lower prevalence in LG tumors compared with HG [MSI-H 0% vs. 4% (P = 0.04), PD-L1 overexpression 1% vs. 6% (P = 0.03), TMB-high 1% vs. 7% (P = 0.05)]. Compared with LG, HG NENs showed a higher mutation rate in BRAF (5.4% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001), KRAS (29.4% vs. 2.6%, P < 0.0001), and PI3KCA (7% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.0001). When compared with GI, PNEN carried higher frequency of MEN1 (25.9% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.0001), FOXO3 (8.6% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.005), ATRX (20.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.007), and TSC2 (6.3% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.007), but lower frequency of mutations in APC (1.0% vs. 13.8%, P < 0.0001).ConclusionsSignificant molecular differences were observed in GEP-NENs by tumor location and grade, indicating differences in carcinogenic pathways and biology.
| S-EPMC8970533 | biostudies-literature