Dataset Information

Comparison of clinical scores in their ability to detect hypoxemic severe OSA patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Severe obstructive sleep apnea (sOSA) and preoperative hypoxemia are risk factors of postoperative complications. Patients exhibiting the combination of both factors are probably at higher perioperative risk. Four scores (STOP-Bang, P-SAP, OSA50, and DES-OSA) are currently used to detect OSA patients preoperatively. This study compared their ability to specifically detect hypoxemic sOSA patients.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-nine patients scheduled for an overnight polysomnography (PSG) were prospectively enrolled. The ability of the four scores to predict the occurrence of hypoxemic episodes in sOSA patients was compared using sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), Youden Index, Cohen kappa coefficient, and the area under ROC curve (AUROC) analyses.

Results

OSA50 elicited the highest Se [95% CI] at detecting hypoxemic sOSA patients (1 [0.89-1]) and was significantly more sensitive than STOP-Bang in that respect. DES-OSA was significantly more specific (0.58 [0.49-0.66]) than the three other scores. The Youden Index of DES-OSA (1.45 [1.33-1.58]) was significantly higher than those of STOP-Bang, P-SAP, and OSA50. The AUROC of DES-OSA (0.8 [0.71-0.89]) was significantly the largest. The highest Kappa value was obtained for DES-OSA (0.33 [0.21-0.45]) and was significantly higher than those of STOP-Bang, and OSA50.

Conclusions

In our population, DES-OSA appears to be more effective than the three other scores to specifically detect hypoxemic sOSA patients. However prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings in a perioperative setting.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02050685.

SUBMITTER: Deflandre E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5937788 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of clinical scores in their ability to detect hypoxemic severe OSA patients.

Deflandre Eric E Piette Nicolas N Bonhomme Vincent V Degey Stephanie S Cambron Laurent L Poirrier Robert R Brichant Jean-Francois JF Joris Jean J

PloS one 20180507 5

<h4>Background</h4>Severe obstructive sleep apnea (sOSA) and preoperative hypoxemia are risk factors of postoperative complications. Patients exhibiting the combination of both factors are probably at higher perioperative risk. Four scores (STOP-Bang, P-SAP, OSA50, and DES-OSA) are currently used to detect OSA patients preoperatively. This study compared their ability to specifically detect hypoxemic sOSA patients.<h4>Methods</h4>One hundred and fifty-nine patients scheduled for an overnight pol ...[more]

PMID: 29734398

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background-aimEarly breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and, therefore, prognostic tools have been developed to evaluate the risk for distant recurrence. In the present study, we sought to develop a risk for recurrence score (RRS) based on mRNA expression of three proliferation markers in high-risk early breast cancer patients and evaluate its ability to predict risk for relapse and death. In addition the Adjuvant! Online score (AOS) was also determined for each patient, providing a 10-year estimate of relapse and mortality risk. We then evaluated whether RRS or AOS might possibly improve the prognostic information of the clinical treatment score (CTS), a model derived from clinicopathological variables.MethodsA total of 1,681 patients, enrolled in two prospective phase III trials, were treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Sufficient RNA was extracted from 875 samples followed by multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for assessing RACGAP1, TOP2A and Ki67 mRNA expression. The CTS, slightly modified to fit our cohort, integrated the prognostic information from age, nodal status, tumor size, histological grade and treatment. Patients were also classified to breast cancer subtypes defined by immunohistochemistry. Likelihood ratio (LR) tests and concordance indices were used to estimate the relative increase in the amount of information provided when either RRS or AOS is added to CTS.ResultsThe optimal RRS, in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), was based on the co-expression of two of the three evaluated genes (RACGAP1 and TOP2A). CTS was prognostic for DFS (p<0.001), while CTS, AOS and RRS were all prognostic for OS (p<0.001, p<0.001 and p = 0.036, respectively). The use of AOS in addition to CTS added prognostic information regarding DFS (LR-Δχ2 8.7, p = 0.003), however the use of RRS in addition to CTS did not. For estimating OS, the use of either AOS or RRS in addition to CTS added significant prognostic information. Specifically, the use of both CTS and AOS had significantly better prognostic value vs. CTS alone (LR-Δχ2 20.8, p<0.001), as well as the use of CTS and RRS vs. CTS alone (LR-Δχ2 4.8, p = 0.028). Additionally, more patients were scored as high-risk by AOS than CTS. According to immunohistochemical subtypes, prognosis was improved in the Luminal A (LR-Δχ2 7.2, p = 0.007) and Luminal B (LR-Δχ2 8.3, p = 0.004) subtypes, in HER2-negative patients (LR-Δχ2 23.4, p<0.001) and in patients with >3 positive nodes (LR-Δχ2 23.9, p<0.001) when AOS was added to CTS.ConclusionsThe current study has shown a clear benefit in predicting overall survival of high-risk early breast cancer patients when combining CTS with either AOS or RRS. The combination of CTS and AOS adds significant prognostic information compared to CTS alone for DFS, while the combination of CTS with either AOS or RRS has better prognostic value than CTS alone for OS. These findings could possibly add on the information needed for the best risk prediction strategy in high-risk early breast cancer patients in a rather simple and inexpensive way, especially in Luminal A and B subtypes, HER2-negative patients and those with >3 positive nodes.

Project description:BackgroundEarly warning scores are designed to identify hospitalized patients who are at high risk of clinical deterioration. Although many general scores have been developed for the medical-surgical wards, specific scores have also been developed for obstetric patients due to differences in normal vital sign ranges and potential complications in this unique population. The comparative performance of general and obstetric early warning scores for predicting deterioration and infection on the maternal wards is not known.MethodsThis was an observational cohort study at the University of Chicago that included patients hospitalized on obstetric wards from November 2008 to December 2018. Obstetric scores (modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS), maternal early warning criteria (MEWC), and maternal early warning trigger (MEWT)), paper-based general scores (Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and National Early Warning Score (NEWS), and a general score developed using machine learning (electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) score) were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic score (AUC) for predicting ward to intensive care unit (ICU) transfer and/or death and new infection.ResultsA total of 19,611 patients were included, with 43 (0.2%) experiencing deterioration (ICU transfer and/or death) and 88 (0.4%) experiencing an infection. eCART had the highest discrimination for deterioration (p < 0.05 for all comparisons), with an AUC of 0.86, followed by MEOWS (0.74), NEWS (0.72), MEWC (0.71), MEWS (0.70), and MEWT (0.65). MEWC, MEWT, and MEOWS had higher accuracy than MEWS and NEWS but lower accuracy than eCART at specific cut-off thresholds. For predicting infection, eCART (AUC 0.77) had the highest discrimination.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of our retrospective study, eCART had the highest accuracy for predicting deterioration and infection in our ante- and postpartum patient population. Maternal early warning scores were more accurate than MEWS and NEWS. While institutional choice of an early warning system is complex, our results have important implications for the risk stratification of maternal ward patients, especially since the low prevalence of events means that small improvements in accuracy can lead to large decreases in false alarms.

Project description:BackgroundThere is very limited evidence identifying factors that increase respiratory drive in hypoxemic intubated patients. Most physiological determinants of respiratory drive cannot be directly assessed at the bedside (e.g., neural inputs from chemo- or mechano-receptors), but clinical risk factors commonly measured in intubated patients could be correlated with increased drive. We aimed to identify clinical risk factors independently associated with increased respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients.MethodsWe analyzed the physiological dataset from a multicenter trial on intubated hypoxemic patients on pressure support (PS). Patients with simultaneous assessment of the inspiratory drop in airway pressure at 0.1-s during an occlusion (P0.1) and risk factors for increased respiratory drive on day 1 were included. We evaluated the independent correlation of the following clinical risk factors for increased drive with P0.1: severity of lung injury (unilateral vs. bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, PaO2/FiO2, ventilatory ratio); arterial blood gases (PaO2, PaCO2 and pHa); sedation (RASS score and drug type); SOFA score; arterial lactate; ventilation settings (PEEP, level of PS, addition of sigh breaths).ResultsTwo-hundred seventeen patients were included. Clinical risk factors independently correlated with higher P0.1 were bilateral infiltrates (increase ratio [IR] 1.233, 95%CI 1.047-1.451, p = 0.012); lower PaO2/FiO2 (IR 0.998, 95%CI 0.997-0.999, p = 0.004); higher ventilatory ratio (IR 1.538, 95%CI 1.267-1.867, p < 0.001); lower pHa (IR 0.104, 95%CI 0.024-0.464, p = 0.003). Higher PEEP was correlated with lower P0.1 (IR 0.951, 95%CI 0.921-0.982, p = 0.002), while sedation depth and drugs were not associated with P0.1.ConclusionsIndependent clinical risk factors for higher respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients include the extent of lung edema and of ventilation-perfusion mismatch, lower pHa, and lower PEEP, while sedation strategy does not affect drive. These data underline the multifactorial nature of increased respiratory drive.

Dataset Information

Comparison of clinical scores in their ability to detect hypoxemic severe OSA patients.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical trial registration

Publications

Comparison of clinical scores in their ability to detect hypoxemic severe OSA patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets