Proteome-Wide Evaluation of Two Common Protein Quantification Methods.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Proteomics experiments commonly aim to estimate and detect differential abundance across all expressed proteins. Within this experimental design, some of the most challenging measurements are small fold changes for lower abundance proteins. While bottom-up proteomics methods are approaching comprehensive coverage of even complex eukaryotic proteomes, failing to reliably quantify lower abundance proteins can limit the precision and reach of experiments to much less than the identified-let alone total-proteome. Here we test the ability of two common methods, a tandem mass tagging (TMT) method and a label-free quantitation method (LFQ), to achieve comprehensive quantitative coverage by benchmarking their capacity to measure 3 different levels of change (3-, 2-, and 1.5-fold) across an entire
SUBMITTER: O'Connell JD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5984592 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA