Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
The aim of the study was to compare the two approaches to chronic right ventricular pacing currently adopted in clinical practice: right ventricular apical (RVA) and non-RVA pacing.Background
Chronic RVA pacing is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, morbidity, and even mortality. Non-RVA pacing may yield more physiologic ventricular activation and provide potential long-term benefits and has recently been adopted as standard procedure at many implanting centers.Methods
The Right Pace study was a multicenter, prospective, single-blind, nonrandomized trial involving 437 patients indicated for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with a high percentage of RV pacing.Results
RV lead-tip target location was the apex or the interventr
SUBMITTER: Muto C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5987304 | biostudies-literature | 2018
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature