Predictive validity and efficiency of ongoing visual-inspection criteria for interpreting functional analyses.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Prior research has evaluated the reliability and validity of structured criteria for visually inspecting functional-analysis (FA) results on a post-hoc basis, after completion of the FA (i.e., post-hoc visual inspection [PHVI]; e.g., Hagopian et al., 1997). However, most behavior analysts inspect FAs using ongoing visual inspection (OVI) as the FA is implemented, and the validity of applying structured criteria during OVI remains unknown. In this investigation, we evaluated the predictive validity and efficiency of applying structured criteria on an ongoing basis by comparing the interim interpretations produced through OVI with (a) the final interpretations produced by PHVI, (b) the authors' post-hoc interpretations (PHAI) reported in the research studies, and (c) the consensus interpreta
SUBMITTER: Saini V
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6002782 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA