Project description:The need for an antireflux procedure during repair of a paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has been the subject of a long-standing controversy. With most centers now performing routine fundoplication during PEH repair, high-quality data on whether crural repair alone or using a mesh may provide adequate anti-reflux effect is still scarce. We sought to answer to the question: "Is fundoplication routinely needed during PEH repair?". Our endpoints were (I) rates of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (either symptomatic or objectively assessed), (II) rates of recurrence, and (III) rates of postoperative dysphagia. We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases for papers published between 1995 and 2019, selecting comparative cohort studies and only including papers reporting the rationale for performing or not performing fundoplication. Overall, nine papers were included for review. While four of the included studies recommended selective or no fundoplication, most of these data come from earlier retrospective studies. Higher-quality data from recent prospective studies including two randomized controlled trials recommended routine fundoplication, mostly due to a significantly lower incidence of postoperative GERD. However, only a relatively short follow-up of 12 months was presented, which we recognize as an important limitation. Fundoplication did not seem to result in reduced recurrence rates when compared to primary repair alone.

| S-EPMC8184421 | biostudies-literature

Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia.

Project description:Video 1Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 2Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 3Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 4Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 5Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 6Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 7Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 8Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 9Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 10Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.Video 11Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00514-9/fulltext.

| S-EPMC8691125 | biostudies-literature

The laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hernia repair.

Project description:IntroductionLaparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair continues to be one of the most challenging procedures facing the minimally invasive surgeon.DiscussionA thorough understanding of the tenets of the operation and advanced skills in minimally invasive laparoscopy are needed for long-term freedom from symptomatic and anatomic recurrence. These include complete reduction of the hernia sac from the mediastinum back into the abdomen with careful preservation of the integrity of muscle and peritoneal lining of the crura, aggressive and complete mobilization of the esophagus to the level of the inferior pulmonary vein, vagal preservation, clear identification of the gastroesophageal junction to allow accurate assessment of the intraabdominal esophageal length, and use of Collis gastroplasty when esophageal lengthening is required for a tension-free intraabdominal repair. Liberal mobilization of the phrenosplenic and phrenogastric attachments substantially increases the mobility of the left limb of the crura, allowing for a tension-free primary closure in a large percentage of patients.ConclusionThe following describes our current approach to laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair following a decade of refinement in a high-volume center.

| S-EPMC4114521 | biostudies-literature

Narrative review of management controversies for paraesophageal hernia.

Project description:ObjectiveTo review management controversies in paraesophageal hernia and options for surgical repair.BackgroundParaesophageal hernia is an increasingly common problem. There are controversies over whether and when paraesophageal hernias should be surgically repaired. In addition, if these hernias are to be repaired, the method of repair, need for mesh reinforcement, need for fundoplication, and need for gastropexy are not uniformly accepted.MethodsRecent literature was reviewed on need for repair, approach (open, laparoscopic or robotic surgery), method of repair (primary suture, use of relaxing incisions, use of mesh reinforcement), materials and configuration of mesh reinforcement, need and type of fundoplication, and need for gastropexy, with emphasis on surgical outcomes.ConclusionsThe extant literature suggests that paraesophageal hernia should be approached in a patient-centered, precision medicine manner. In general, hernia reduction, sac excision and primary suture approximation of the hiatal crura are mandatory. Use of mesh should be based on individual risk factors; if mesh is used, biological meshes appear to have a more favorable safety profile, with the "reverse C" or keyhole configuration allowing for increase in crural tensile strength at it most vulnerable areas. Use and choice of fundoplication or magnetic sphincter augmentation should be based on individual considerations. Finally, gastropexy is generally ineffective and should be used only in extreme circumstances.

| S-EPMC8339754 | biostudies-literature

Surgical Techniques for Robotically-Assisted Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.

Project description:The surgical approach to giant paraesophageal hernia repair has evolved considerably, from an open approach to minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches to giant paraesophageal hernia have been considered safe and are associated with less morbidity and mortality. Limited data exist comparing the efficacy between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted giant paraesophageal hernia repairs, but the benefits of robotic surgery include superior optics and freedom of motion, thus allowing surgeons to accomplish the key points in a successful repair without compromising patient outcomes.

| S-EPMC8689581 | biostudies-literature

Gastric volvulus through Morgagni hernia and intestinal diverticulosis in an adult patient: a case report.

Project description:BackgroundMorgagni's hernia (MH) is a rare type of congenital diaphragmatic hernia with limited available literature. Late presentations are infrequent and the ones complicated due to gastric volvulus are even rarer. Another uncommon association of MH is with small bowel diverticulosis. We herein discussed a case of gastric volvulus as the content of MH, and small bowel diverticulosis present in a patient concomitantly.Case presentationA 30 year old woman, who presented with a one year history of epigastric burning and indigestion, occasionally associated with pain and vomiting. On clinical examination, no clue to the diagnosis could be ascertained. Her chest and abdominal x-ray indicated an abnormal air-fluid level at right hemithorax, which prompted a Computed Tomography (CT) scan, showing organo-axial gastric volvulus. MH with gastric volvulus was observed during laparotomy and trans-thoracic reduction of the contents was performed, along with repair of the defect. Multiple intestinal diverticuli were also found and the largest diverticulum was excised.ConclusionsGastric volvulus through MH is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. Non-specific symptoms like epigastric pain and vomiting can delay the diagnosis and management, however, advanced imaging techniques like CT scan can speed up this process. After the diagnosis is made, surgical repair should be attempted regardless of symptoms.

| S-EPMC6116383 | biostudies-literature

Laparoscopic reduction and repair of a large incarcerated paraesophageal hernia.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC4081239 | biostudies-literature

Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.

Project description:ObjectiveLaparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia is a complex operation requiring significant laparoscopic expertise. Our objective was to compare our current approach and outcomes for laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia with our previous experience.MethodsA retrospective review of patients undergoing nonemergency laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia, stratified by early versus current era (January 1997-June 2003 and July 2003-June 2008), was performed. We evaluated clinical outcomes, barium esophagogram, and quality of life.ResultsLaparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia was performed in 662 patients (median age 70 years, range 19-92 years) with a median percentage of herniated stomach of 70% (range 30%-100%). With time, use of Collis gastroplasty decreased (86% to 53%), as did crural mesh reinforcement (17% to 12%). Current era patients were 50% more likely to have a Charlson comorbidity index score greater than 3. Thirty-day mortality was 1.7% (11/662). Mortality and complication rates were stable with time, despite increasing comorbid disease in current era. Postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life scores were available for 489 patients (30-month median follow-up), with good to excellent results in 90% (438/489). Radiographic recurrence (15.7%) was not associated with symptom recurrence. Reoperation occurred in 3.2% (21/662).ConclusionsWith time, we have obtained significant minimally invasive experience and refined our approach to laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia. Perioperative morbidity and mortality remain low, despite increased comorbid disease in the current era. Laparoscopic repair provided excellent patient satisfaction and symptom improvement, even with small radiographic recurrences. Reoperation rates were comparable to the best open series.

| S-EPMC2813424 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic treatment of sigmoid volvulus.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5990372 | biostudies-literature