Dataset Information

Etiology of hormone receptor positive breast cancer differs by levels of histologic grade and proliferation.

ABSTRACT: Limited epidemiological evidence suggests that the etiology of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer may differ by levels of histologic grade and proliferation. We pooled risk factor and pathology data on 5,905 HR+ breast cancer cases and 26,281 controls from 11 epidemiological studies. Proliferation was determined by centralized automated measures of KI67 in tissue microarrays. Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values for case-case and case-control comparisons for risk factors in relation to levels of grade and quartiles (Q1-Q4) of KI67 were estimated using polytomous logistic regression models. Case-case comparisons showed associations between nulliparity and high KI67 [OR (95% CI) for Q4 vs. Q1 = 1.54 (1.22, 1.95)]; obesity and high grade [grade 3 vs. 1 = 1.68 (1.31, 2.16)] and current use of combined hormone therapy (HT) and low grade [grade 3 vs. 1 = 0.27 (0.16, 0.44)] tumors. In case-control comparisons, nulliparity was associated with elevated risk of tumors with high but not low levels of proliferation [1.43 (1.14, 1.81) for KI67 Q4 vs. 0.83 (0.60, 1.14) for KI67 Q1]; obesity among women ≥50 years with high but not low grade tumors [1.55 (1.17, 2.06) for grade 3 vs. 0.88 (0.66, 1.16) for grade 1] and HT with low but not high grade tumors [3.07 (2.22, 4.23) for grade 1 vs. 0.85 (0.55, 1.30) for grade 3]. Menarcheal age and family history were similarly associated with HR+ tumors of different grade or KI67 levels. These findings provide insights into the etiologic heterogeneity of HR+ tumors.

SUBMITTER: Abubakar M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6041155 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Etiology of hormone receptor positive breast cancer differs by levels of histologic grade and proliferation.

Abubakar Mustapha M Chang-Claude Jenny J Ali H Raza HR Chatterjee Nilanjan N Coulson Penny P Daley Frances F Blows Fiona F Benitez Javier J Milne Roger L RL Brenner Hermann H Stegmaier Christa C Mannermaa Arto A Rudolph Anja A Sinn Peter P Couch Fergus J FJ Devilee Peter P Tollenaar Rob A E M RAEM Seynaeve Caroline C Figueroa Jonine J Lissowska Jolanta J Hewitt Stephen S Hooning Maartje J MJ Hollestelle Antoinette A Foekens Renée R Koppert Linetta B LB Bolla Manjeet K MK Wang Qin Q Jones Michael E ME Schoemaker Minouk J MJ Keeman Renske R Easton Douglas F DF Swerdlow Anthony J AJ Sherman Mark E ME Schmidt Marjanka K MK Pharoah Paul D PD Garcia-Closas Montserrat M

International journal of cancer 20180325 4

Limited epidemiological evidence suggests that the etiology of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer may differ by levels of histologic grade and proliferation. We pooled risk factor and pathology data on 5,905 HR+ breast cancer cases and 26,281 controls from 11 epidemiological studies. Proliferation was determined by centralized automated measures of KI67 in tissue microarrays. Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values for case-case and case-control comparisons for ri ...[more]

PMID: 29492969

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAKT pathway activation is implicated in endocrine-therapy resistance. Data on the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, as an addition to fulvestrant therapy, in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer are limited.MethodsIn a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled eligible pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women and men with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who had had a relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. The dual primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with AKT pathway-altered (PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN) tumors. Safety was assessed.ResultsOverall, 708 patients underwent randomization; 289 patients (40.8%) had AKT pathway alterations, and 489 (69.1%) had received a CDK4/6 inhibitor previously for advanced breast cancer. In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.6 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.71; P<0.001). In the AKT pathway-altered population, the median progression-free survival was 7.3 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.1 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or higher in patients receiving capivasertib-fulvestrant were rash (in 12.1% of patients, vs. in 0.3% of those receiving placebo-fulvestrant) and diarrhea (in 9.3% vs. 0.3%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in 13.0% of the patients receiving capivasertib and in 2.3% of those receiving placebo.ConclusionsCapivasertib-fulvestrant therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed during or after previous aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor. (Funded by AstraZeneca and the National Cancer Institute; CAPItello-291 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04305496.).

Project description:Background: The prognosis of breast cancer varies according to the molecular subtype. Transmembrane 4 L six family 1 (TM4SF1) exhibits different expression patterns among the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. However, the expression profile of TM4SF1 in hormone receptor HR+HER2- breast cancer remains unclear. Methods: TM4SF1 mRNA levels were examined in major subclasses of breast cancer by analyzing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. In addition, TM4SF1 protein and mRNA levels in HR+HER2- breast cancer tissue samples were determined by immunohistochemistry and Western blot assay. The effect of TM4SF1 on cell proliferation was evaluated using MTT, colony formation, 3D organoid, and xenograft models, following the TM4SF1 overexpression or knockdown. Results: TCGA database analysis demonstrated that TM4SF1 was downregulated in breast cancer compared with the healthy adjacent breast tissue. In addition, the expression of TM4SF1 in basal-like one and the mesenchymal TNBC tissue was higher than that of the healthy adjacent breast tissue. Other types, including the luminal androgen receptor-positive TNBC tissue, expressed lower levels of TM4SF1. Immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR assays demonstrated that the TM4SF1 protein and mRNA levels were downregulated in the HR+HER2- breast cancer tissue compared with the healthy adjacent tissue. Moreover, the TM4SF1 overexpression reduced the viability of MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells, whilst reducing the number of colonies and 3D-organoids formed by these cell lines. By contrast, TM4SF1 knockdown led to an increased MCF-7 cell proliferation. However, in the TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-231, TM4SF1 silencing reduced cell proliferation. In vivo, the TM4SF1 overexpression inhibited MCF-7 xenograft growth in a nude mouse model, which was associated with the downregulation of the Ki-67 expression, apoptosis induction, and inhibition of the mTOR pathway. Conclusion: TM4SF1 is downregulated in HR + HER2-breast cancer, and the overexpression of TM4SF1 suppresses cell proliferation in this cancer subtype.

Dataset Information

Etiology of hormone receptor positive breast cancer differs by levels of histologic grade and proliferation.

Publications

Etiology of hormone receptor positive breast cancer differs by levels of histologic grade and proliferation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets