Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
We examine whether drugs' excluded versus recommended status on pharmacy benefit manager exclusion lists corresponds to evidence from cost-effectiveness analyses, lack of evidence, or rebates.Data sources
To find cost-effectiveness data for drugs on 2016 exclusion lists of CVS Caremark and Express Scripts, we searched the Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry and the peer-reviewed literature.Study design
For each excluded and recommended drug, we compared the mean cost-per-QALY, and we calculated the difference between the numbers of excluded and recommended drugs for which we could find no cost-effectiveness evidence.Data collection
As keywords in our searches, we used the brand and generic drug name and "cost-effectiveness" and "cost-per-qua
SUBMITTER: Cohen JP
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6056588 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature