Testing formal predictions of neuroscientific theories of ADHD with a cognitive model-based approach.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Neuroscientific theories of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) alternately posit that cognitive aberrations in the disorder are due to acute attentional lapses, slowed neural processing, or reduced signal-to-noise ratios. However, they make similar predictions about behavioral summary statistics (response times [RTs] and accuracy), hindering the field's ability to produce strong and specific tests of these theories. The current study uses the linear ballistic accumulator (LBA; Brown & Heathcote, 2008), a mathematical model of choice RT tasks, to distinguish between competing theory predictions. Children with ADHD (n = 80) and age-matched controls (n = 32) completed a numerosity discrimination paradigm at 2 levels of difficulty, and RT data were fit to the LBA model to test the
SUBMITTER: Weigard A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6091877 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA