Evaluating Whole Grain Intervention Study Designs and Reporting Practices Using Evidence Mapping Methodology.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Consumption of whole grains have been associated with reduced risk of chronic diseases in many observational studies; yet, results of intervention studies are mixed. We aimed to use evidence mapping to capture the methodological and reporting variability in whole grain intervention studies that may contribute to this inconsistency. We conducted a reproducible search in OVID Medline for whole grain human intervention studies (published 1946 to February 2018). After screening based on a priori criteria, we identified 202 publications describing a total of 213 unique trials. Over half (55%) were acute trials, lasting ≤1 day, 30% were moderate duration studies (up to 6 weeks) and 15% were of longer duration (more than 6 weeks). The majority of acute trials (75%) examined measures of glycaemia
SUBMITTER: Sawicki CM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6115963 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA