Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To compare the measured stone burden recorded between urologists and radiologists, and examine how these differences could potentially impact stone management. As current urologic stone surgery guideline recommendations are based on stone size, accurate stone measurements are crucial to direct appropriate treatment. This study investigated the discrepant interpretation that often exists between urologic surgeons and radiologists' estimation of patient urinary stone burden.Materials and methods
From November 2015 through August 2016, new patients prospectively enrolled into the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU) were included if they had computed tomography images available and an accompanying official radiologic report at the time of their urolog
SUBMITTER: Tzou DT
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6139031 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature