Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based exercise intervention in primary care: a within-trial analysis and beyond-trial modelling.


ABSTRACT:

Objectives

A short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of two pedometer-based walking interventions compared with usual care.

Design

(A) Short-term CEA: parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial randomised by household. (B) Long-term CEA: Markov decision model.

Setting

Seven primary care practices in South London, UK.

Participants

(A) Short-term CEA: 1023 people (922 households) aged 45-75 years without physical activity (PA) contraindications. (b) Long-term CEA: a cohort of 100 000 people aged 59-88 years.

Interventions

Pedometers, 12-week walking programmes and PA diaries delivered by post or through three PA consultations with practice nurses.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Accelerometer-measured change (baseline to 12 months) in average daily step count and time in 10 min bouts of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), and EQ-5D-5L quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).

Methods

Resource use costs (£2013/2014) from a National Health Service perspective, presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for each outcome over a 1-year and lifetime horizon, with cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and willingness to pay per QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluate uncertainty.

Results

(A) Short-term CEA: At 12 months, incremental cost was £3.61 (£109)/min in ≥10 min MVPA bouts for nurse support compared with control (postal group). At £20 000/QALY, the postal group had a 50% chance of being cost saving compared with control. (B) Long-term CEA: The postal group had more QALYs (+759 QALYs, 95% CI 400 to 1247) and lower costs (-£11 million, 95% CI -12 to -10) than control and nurse groups, resulting in an incremental net monetary benefit of £26 million per 100 000 population. Results were sensitive to reporting serious adverse events, excluding health service use, and including all participant costs.

Conclusions

Postal delivery of a pedometer intervention in primary care is cost-effective long term and has a 50% chance of being cost-effective, through resource savings, within 1 year. Further research should ascertain maintenance of the higher levels of PA, and its impact on quality of life and health service use.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN98538934; Pre-results.

SUBMITTER: Anokye N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6196874 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based exercise intervention in primary care: a within-trial analysis and beyond-trial modelling.

Anokye Nana N   Fox-Rushby Julia J   Sanghera Sabina S   Cook Derek G DG   Limb Elizabeth E   Furness Cheryl C   Kerry Sally Margaret SM   Victor Christina R CR   Iliffe Steve S   Ussher Michael M   Whincup Peter H PH   Ekelund Ulf U   deWilde Stephen S   Harris Tess T  

BMJ open 20181017 10


<h4>Objectives</h4>A short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of two pedometer-based walking interventions compared with usual care.<h4>Design</h4>(A) Short-term CEA: parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial randomised by household. (B) Long-term CEA: Markov decision model.<h4>Setting</h4>Seven primary care practices in South London, UK.<h4>Participants</h4>(A) Short-term CEA: 1023 people (922 households) aged 45-75 years without physical activity (PA) contraindications. (b)  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6860934 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10883141 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10953202 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9621600 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6501827 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7825166 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10084845 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10232996 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8294827 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4808504 | biostudies-literature