Dataset Information

Oral curcumin in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Curcumin, a popular herbal supplement from the plant turmeric, has prevented ischemic reperfusion and toxin-induced injury in many animal studies and a single-centre randomized human trial. We sought to test whether perioperative oral curcumin (compared with placebo) affects the inflammatory response and risk of postrepair complications after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in humans.

Methods

We conducted a parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients from 10 hospitals in Canada who were scheduled to undergo elective repair of an unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (November 2011 to November 2014). Patients in the treatment group received perioperative oral curcumin (2000-mg doses 8 times over 4 d). Patients, health care providers and local research staff were unaware of the treatment assignment. The primary outcomes were median concentrations of 4 bio markers indicating injury and inflammation (postoperative urine interleukin-18 and perioperative rise in serum creatinine, plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein).

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups (606 patients overall; median age 76 yr). More than 85% of patients in each group took more than 80% of their scheduled capsules. Neither curcumin nor placebo significantly affected any of the 4 biomarkers (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Regarding the secondary outcomes, there was a higher risk of acute kidney injury with curcumin than with placebo (17% v. 10%, p = 0.01), but no between-group difference in the median length of hospital stay (5 v. 5 days, p > 0.9) or the risk of clinical events (9% v. 9%, p = 0.9).

Interpretation

Curcumin had no beneficial effects when used in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. These findings emphasize the importance of testing turmeric and curcumin before espousing their health benefits, as is currently done in the popular media.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01225094.

SUBMITTER: Garg AX

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6205831 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Oral curcumin in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Garg Amit X AX Devereaux P J PJ Hill Andrew A Sood Manish M Aggarwal Bharat B Dubois Luc L Hiremath Swapnil S Guzman Randolph R Iyer Vikram V James Matthew M McArthur Eric E Moist Louise L Ouellet George G Parikh Chirag R CR Schumann Virginia V Sharan Sumit S Thiessen-Philbrook Heather H Tobe Sheldon S Wald Ron R Walsh Michael M Weir Matthew M Pannu Neesh N

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 20181001 43

<h4>Background</h4>Curcumin, a popular herbal supplement from the plant turmeric, has prevented ischemic reperfusion and toxin-induced injury in many animal studies and a single-centre randomized human trial. We sought to test whether perioperative oral curcumin (compared with placebo) affects the inflammatory response and risk of postrepair complications after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in humans.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled trial ...[more]

PMID: 30373740

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for 90 day death after elective open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in women. Methods This was a multicentre case control study. The nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit registry (2013–2019) was solely used to identify women who underwent elective OSR as eligible patients. Data for this study were subsequently collected from the patients’ medical files. Women with AAA were included and those who died (cases) were compared with those who survived (controls) 90 days after surgery. Inflammatory, mycotic, or symptomatic or ruptured AAA were excluded. The association between pre- and peri-operative risk factors and death was assessed by logistic regression analysis in the whole sample and after matching cases to controls of the same age at the time of repair. Mesenteric artery patency was also assessed on pre-operative computed tomography and used in the analysis. Results In total, 266 patients (30 cases and 236 controls) from 21 hospitals were included. Cases were older (median [interquartile range; IQR] 75 years [71, 78.3] vs. 71 years [66, 77]; p = .002) and more often had symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (14/29 [48%] vs. 49/227 [22%]; p = .002). Intra-operative blood loss (median [IQR] 1.6 L [1.1, 3.0] vs. 1.2 L [0.7, 1.8]), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (10/30 [33%] vs. 8/236 [3%]), renal failure (17/30 [57%] vs. 33/236 [14%]), and bowel ischaemia (BI) (17/29 [59%] vs. 12/236 [5%]) were more prevalent among cases. Older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.19) and PAD (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.57–9.74) were associated with death. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that, after adjustment for age, AMI (OR 9.34, 95% CI 1.66–52.4) and BI (OR 35.6, 95% CI 3.41–370) were associated with death. Superior mesenteric artery stenosis of >70% had a clinically relevant association with BI (OR 5.23, 95% CI 1.43–19.13; p = .012). Conclusion Age, symptomatic PAD, AMI, and BI were risk factors for death after elective OSR in women. The association between a >70% SMA stenosis and BI may call for action in selected cases. Highlights • Identifying risk factors for death after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in women.• Older age and symptomatic peripheral artery disease are associated with death.• Acute myocardial infarction and bowel ischaemia (BI) also increase mortality risk.• Superior mesenteric artery stenosis seems to be a clinically relevant factor for BI.

Project description:ObjectiveThe benefit of prophylactic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is based on the risk of rupture exceeding the risk of death from other comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to validate a 5-year survival prediction model for patients undergoing elective repair of asymptomatic AAA <6.5 cm to assist in optimal selection of patients.MethodsAll patients undergoing elective repair for asymptomatic AAA <6.5 cm (open or endovascular) from 2002 to 2011 were identified from a single institutional database (validation group). We assessed the ability of a prior published Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) model (derivation group) to predict survival in our cohort. The model was assessed for discrimination (concordance index), calibration (calibration slope and calibration in the large), and goodness of fit (score test).ResultsThe VSGNE derivation group consisted of 2367 patients (70% endovascular). Major factors associated with survival in the derivation group were age, coronary disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal function, and antiplatelet and statin medication use. Our validation group consisted of 1038 patients (59% endovascular). The validation group was slightly older (74 vs 72 years; P < .01) and had a higher proportion of men (76% vs 68%; P < .01). In addition, the derivation group had higher rates of advanced cardiac disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and baseline creatinine concentration (1.2 vs 1.1 mg/dL; P < .01). Despite slight differences in preoperative patient factors, 5-year survival was similar between validation and derivation groups (75% vs 77%; P = .33). The concordance index of the validation group was identical between derivation and validation groups at 0.659 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.69). Our validation calibration in the large value was 1.02 (P = .62, closer to 1 indicating better calibration), calibration slope of 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.97), and score test of P = .57 (>.05 indicating goodness of fit).ConclusionsAcross different populations of patients, assessment of age and level of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal disease can accurately predict 5-year survival in patients with AAA <6.5 cm undergoing repair. This risk prediction model is a valid method to assess mortality risk in determining potential overall survival benefit from elective AAA repair.

Project description:BackgroundPrior studies have demonstrated poor perioperative and long-term survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis who undergo abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAAR). However, survival in dialysis patients overall has improved over time. We hypothesize that the contemporary rates of perioperative and long-term survival following AAAR in ESKD patients are also improving.MethodsData on AAAR procedures in dialysis patients were collected from the United States Renal Data System between 2008 and 2017. Endovascular (EVAR) and open AAA repair (OAR) were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients with a functioning renal transplant, a ruptured aneurysm, and insurance other than Medicare were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and long-term outcomes were collected. Standard statistical methods were used.ResultsWe identified 3,374 patients who underwent EVAR (86%, 2,914/3,374) and OAR (14%, 460/3,374). The utilization of OAR decreased significantly from 2008 to 2017 (17.34% vs. 7.43%, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant difference in 5-year survival between OAR and EVAR (24% vs. 17%, P = 0.1, Wilcoxon-Breslow test), but open repair was associated with increased long-term survival (Hazards ratio 0.994, confidence interval 0.990-0.999, P = 0.017) in an adjusted Cox regression model. The cohort was then divided based on the year of AAAR, group 1: 2008-2010 (1,269/3,374), group 2: 2011-2013 (1,071/3,374), and group 3: 2014-2017 (1,034/3,374). Compared to groups 1 and 2, Group 3 was less likely to have coronary artery device, peripheral vascular disease, recent pneumonia, be nonambulatory, live in a nursing facility, or undergo an OAR and more likely to be younger and dialyze through an arteriovenous fistula/arteriovenous graft at the time of AAA repair. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was significantly lower in group 3 compared to groups 1 and 2 (5.4% [56/1,034] vs. 10.3% [131/1,269]/7.3% [78/1,071], P < 0.031). One-year survival by Kaplan-Meier estimate was significantly higher in group 3 (77.7% [803/1,034]) versus groups 1 and 2 (56.7% [719/1,269], 66.9% [716/1,071], P < 0.001, log-rank test). Five-year survival was also significantly higher in group 3 (27.3%) compared to groups 1 and 2 (14.2% and 16.5%, P < 0.001, log-rank test). In a Cox regression model of long-term mortality adjusted for variables significant on a univariate testing, more recent procedure year was associated with increased survival (Hazards ratio 0.81, [0.77, 0.85], P < 0.001).ConclusionsPostoperative and long-term survival following AAA repair have increased over time in ESKD patients on dialysis. This increased survival persists after accounting for differences in patient demographics and type of procedure over time. Elective AAA repair should be considered in carefully selected good-risk patients on dialysis.

Project description:BackgroundEvidence for benefit of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) over open surgical repair for de novo infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in younger patients remains conflicting because of heterogeneous study populations and small sample sizes. The objective of this study was to compare perioperative and short-term outcomes for EVAR and open surgery in younger patients using a large national disease and procedure-specific data set.MethodsWe identified patients 65 years of age or younger undergoing first-time elective EVAR or open AAA repair from the Vascular Quality Initiative (2003-2014). We excluded patients with pararenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysms, those medically unfit for open repair, and those undergoing EVAR for isolated iliac aneurysms. Clinical and procedural characteristics were balanced using inverse propensity of treatment weighting. A supplemental analysis extended the study to those younger than 70 years.ResultsWe identified 2641 patients, 73% (n = 1928) EVAR and 27% (n = 713) open repair. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 59-64 years), and 13% were female. The median follow-up time was 401 days (interquartile range, 357-459 days). Unadjusted perioperative survival was 99.6% overall (open repair, 99.1%; EVAR, 99.8%; P < .001), with 97.4% 1-year survival overall (open repair, 97.3%; EVAR, 97.4%; P = .9). Unadjusted reintervention rates were five (open repair) and seven (EVAR) reinterventions per 100 person-years (P = .8). After propensity weighting, the absolute incidence of perioperative mortality was <1% in both groups (open repair, 0.9%, EVAR, 0.2%; P < .001), and complication rates were low. Propensity-weighted survival (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.38; P = .6) and reintervention rates (open repair, 6; EVAR, 8; reinterventions per 100 person-years; P = .8) did not differ between the two interventions. The analysis of those younger than 70 years showed similar results.ConclusionsIn this study of younger patients undergoing repair of infrarenal AAA, 30-day morbidity and mortality for both open surgery and EVAR are low, and the absolute mortality difference is small. The prior published perioperative mortality and 1-year survival benefit of EVAR over open AAA repair is not observed in younger patients. Further studies of long-term durability are needed to guide decision-making for open repair vs EVAR in this population.

Dataset Information

Oral curcumin in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Interpretation

Trial registration

Publications

Oral curcumin in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets