Cholesterol crystals in pleural fluid.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Genzen JR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6223240 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Cholesterol crystals in pleural fluid.
Genzen Jonathan R JR Motin Abdul A
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 20120301 5
Similar Datasets
Project description:Transcriptional profile comparison of the pleural and ascites fluids in hydropic fetuses affected with chylothorax.
2012-12-31 | GSE33872 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional profile comparison of the pleural and ascites fluids in hydropic fetuses affected with chylothorax. Two-condition experiment, pleural fluid vs. ascites fluid. Comparison of the transcriptional profile between sample collected before and after OK-432 treatment and between fetuses with and without a G404S mutation in the ITGA9 gene
2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-33872 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7850045 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10267800 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Pleural fluid homocysteine (HCY) can be useful for diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). There are no published studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of HCY with other tumour markers in pleural fluid for diagnosis of MPE. The aim was to compare the accuracy of HCY with that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA) 15.3, CA19.9 and CA125 in pleural fluid and to develop a probabilistic model using these biomarkers to differentiate benign (BPE) from MPE. METHODS:Patients with pleural effusion were randomly included. HCY, CEA, CA15.3, CEA19.9 and CA125 were quantified in pleural fluid. Patients were classified into two groups: MPE or BPE. By applying logistic regression analysis, a multivariate probabilistic model was developed using pleural fluid biomarkers. The diagnostic accuracy was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS:Population of study comprised 133 patients (72 males and 61 females) aged between 1 and 96 years (median = 70 years), 81 BPE and 52 MPE. The logistic regression analysis included HCY (p<0.0001) and CEA (p = 0.0022) in the probabilistic model and excluded the other tumour markers. The probabilistic model was: HCY+CEA = Probability(%) = 100×(1+e-z)-1, where Z = 0.5471×[HCY]+0.3846×[CEA]-8.2671. The AUCs were 0.606, 0.703, 0.778, 0.800, 0.846 and 0.948 for CA125, CA19.9, CEA, CA15.3, HCY and HCY+CEA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Pleural fluid HCY has higher accuracy for diagnosis of MPE than CEA, CA15.3, CA19.9 and CA125. The combination of HCY and CEA concentrations in pleural fluid significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of the test.
| S-EPMC6759144 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPleural effusions are most commonly classified as transudative or exudative based on Light's criteria which has shown misclassification in 10%-20% of cases. Studies have demonstrated lesser misclassification with pleural fluid cholesterol criteria. Thus, this study aimed to find the diagnostic properties of pleural fluid cholesterol in differentiating the type of effusion.Materials and methodsThis cross-sectional study involving 72 patients was undertaken in a tertiary center in Nepal for a duration of 2 years. On the basis of Light's, Heffner's, etiological, and pleural fluid cholesterol criteria, pleural effusion was classified as exudative or transudative. The findings were then evaluated to determine the diagnostic value of each approach in identifying the effusion type and comparing them on the basis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.ResultPleural fluid cholesterol detected effusion as exudative with sensitivity of 91.94% and specificity of 80.00% against Light's criteria; with a sensitivity of 98.28% and specificity of 85.71% against the etiological diagnosis. Additionally, against the etiological diagnosis, sensitivity of both Light's and Heffner's criteria was 100%; however, specificity was 71.43% and 64.29% respectively, which is far less than that of pleural fluid cholesterol (85.71%). Furthermore, pleural fluid cholesterol was also found to have better results than protein ratio, LDH ratio and pleural fluid protein ratio in determining the type of effusion.ConclusionWhen considering the avoidance of confusing outcomes in equivocal instances and cost effectiveness in developing nations, pleural fluid cholesterol can be one of the most useful alternative diagnostic methods for differentiating between exudative or transudative effusions.
| S-EPMC9577431 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectivePleural fluid is a source from which various biomarkers can be obtained and measured to facilitate the management and prognostication of various conditions. This narrative review aims to summarise a few selected applications of pleural fluid biomarker analysis based on the latest literature.MethodsA literature search for articles published in English regarding human subjects from the period January 2000 to December 2023 was performed through PubMed. Publications considered by the authors to be relevant were included in this review, with additional references added based on the authors' judgement. This review considered both prospective and retrospective cohort studies analysing the clinical value of a range of pleural fluid biomarkers.Key content and findingsThe biomarkers selected in this narrative review have either established clinical applicability or promising initial results which require further research. Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase, mesothelin and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide can optimize the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis, malignant mesothelioma and heart failure-related pleural effusion respectively. The detection rate for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations for lung cancer is higher in the pleural fluid than in the pleural tissue or plasma. Suitable targeted therapy in patients with detectable mutations can offer survival benefits. The pleural fluid neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 carry prognostic implications and can potentially guide subsequent treatment decisions. These biomarkers used individually, or in conjunction with other clinical parameters, should only be utilised in pre-defined, appropriate clinical conditions to maximize their clinical value.ConclusionsA great variety of different biomarkers are available for analysis in pleural fluid. Further research and development are necessary to widen the spectrum and enhance the clinical utility of pleural fluid biomarkers. Comparison with the diagnostic utilities of serum biomarkers and other investigation parameters, such as radiological findings, could be considered when evaluating the performance of pleural fluid biomarkers.
| S-EPMC11320250 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) or malignant pleural effusions (MPE) frequently have similar pleural fluid profiles. New biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of TPE are required. We determined whether cytokine profiles in the PE of patients could aid the differential diagnosis of TPE. 30 patients with TPE, 30 patients with MPE, 14 patients with empyema (EMP) and 14 patients with parapneumonic effusion (PPE) were enrolled between Dec 2018 and 2019. The levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, IL-27, CXCL8, CCL-1 and IP-10 were determined in PE by ELISA along with measurements of adenosine deaminase (ADA). The best predictors of TPE were combined ADA.IL-27 [optimal cut-off value = 42.68 (103 U ng/l2), sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.28%], ADA [cut off value 27.5 (IU/l), sensitivity 90%, specificity 96.5%] and IL-27 [cut-off value = 2363 (pg/ml), sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 98.3%, p ≤ 0.0001]. A high level of IL-6 [cut-off value = 3260 (pg/ml), sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.2%], CXCL8 [cut-off value = 144.5 (pg/ml), sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 58.6%], CCL1 [cut-off value = 54 (pg/ml), sensitivity 100%, specificity 70.7%] and IP-10 [cut-off value = 891.9 (pg/ml), sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 48.3%] were also predictive of TPE. High ADA.IL-27, ADA and IL-27 levels differentiate between TPE and non-TPE with improved specificity and diagnostic accuracy and may be useful clinically.
| S-EPMC7803752 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPleural tuberculosis (PlTB), the most common site of extrapulmonary TB, is characterized by a paucibacillary nature and a compartmentalized inflammatory response in the pleural cavity, both of which make diagnosis and management extremely challenging. Although transcriptional signatures for pulmonary TB have already been described, data obtained by using this approach for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and, specifically, for pleural tuberculosis are scarce and heterogeneous. In the present study, a set of candidate genes previously described in pulmonary TB was evaluated to identify and validate a transcriptional signature in clinical samples from a Brazilian cohort of PlTB patients and those with other exudative causes of pleural effusion.MethodsAs a first step, target genes were selected by a random forest algorithm with recursive feature elimination (RFE) from public microarray datasets. Then, peripheral blood (PB) and pleural fluid (PF) samples from recruited patients presenting exudative pleural effusion were collected during the thoracentesis procedure. Transcriptional analysis of the selected top 10 genes was performed by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR).ResultsReanalysis of the public datasets identified a set of candidate genes (CARD17, BHLHE40, FCGR1A, BATF2, STAT1, BTN3A1, ANKRD22, C1QB, GBP2, and SEPTIN4) that demonstrated a global accuracy of 89.5% in discriminating pulmonary TB cases from other respiratory diseases. Our validation cohort consisted of PlTB (n = 35) patients and non-TB (n = 34) ones. The gene expressions of CARD17, GBP2, and C1QB in PF at diagnosis were significantly different between the two (PlTB and non-TB) groups (p < 0.0001). It was observed that the gene expressions of CARD17 and GBP2 were higher in PlTB PF than in non-TB patients. C1QB showed the opposite behavior, being higher in the non-TB PF. After anti-TB therapy, however, GBP2 gene expression was significantly reduced in PlTB patients (p < 0.001). Finally, the accuracy of the three above-cited highlighted genes in the PF was analyzed, showing AUCs of 91%, 90%, and 85%, respectively. GBP2 was above 80% (sensitivity = 0.89/specificity = 0.81), and CARD17 showed significant specificity (Se = 0.69/Sp = 0.95) in its capacity to discriminate the groups.ConclusionCARD17, GBP2, and C1QB showed promise in discriminating PlTB from other causes of exudative pleural effusion by providing accurate diagnoses, thus accelerating the initiation of anti-TB therapy.
| S-EPMC10822927 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNumerous studies have described the critical importance of interleukin (IL) -36γ in host defense against lung infections, but it is unknown whether it plays a role in infectious pleural effusion (IPE). This study aimed to examine the levels of IL-36γ in pleural effusions of different etiologies and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of IL-36γ in the differential diagnosis of IPE.MethodsA total of 112 individuals was enrolled in this research. IL-36γ levels in pleural fluids of all 112 patients were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We also characterized these markers' diagnostic values across various groups.ResultsPatients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) and parapneumonic effusion (PPE) had exhibited markedly higher IL-36γ levels in their pleural fluid than the malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and transudative effusion patients. Furthermore, the IL-36γ concentrations in TPE patients were evidently higher than in uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UPPE) patients but significantly lower than in complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE)/empyema patients. Pleural fluid IL-36γ is a useful marker to differentiate TPE from UPPE, at a cut-off value for 657.5 pg/ml (area under the curve = 0.904, p < 0.0001) with 70.0% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity.ConclusionsThe elevated IL-36γ in pleural effusion may be used as a novel biomarker for infectious pleural effusion diagnosis, particularly in patients with CPPE/empyema, and is a potentially promising biomarker to differentiate between TPE and UPPE.
| S-EPMC9833963 | biostudies-literature