Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Continuous mixture interpretation methods that employ probabilistic genotyping to compute the Likelihood Ratio (LR) utilize more information than threshold-based systems. The continuous interpretation schemes described in the literature, however, do not all use the same underlying probabilistic model and standards outlining which probabilistic models may or may not be implemented into casework do not exist; thus, it is the individual forensic laboratory or expert that decides which model and corresponding software program to implement. For countries, such as the United States, with an adversarial legal system, one can envision a scenario where two probabilistic models are used to present the weight of evidence, and two LRs are presented by two experts. Conversely, if no independent review
SUBMITTER: Swaminathan H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6245789 | biostudies-literature | 2018
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA