Variability in monocular and binocular fixation during standard automated perimetry.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to use standard automated perimetry to compare fixation variability among the dominant eye fixation, non-dominant eye fixation, and binocular fixation conditions. Thirty-five eyes of 35 healthy young participants underwent standard automated perimetry (Humphrey 24-2 SITA-Standard) in dominant eye fixation, non-dominant eye fixation, and binocular fixation conditions. Fixation variability during foveal threshold and visual field measurement, which was recorded using a wearable eye-tracking glass and calculated using the bivariate contour ellipse area (deg2), was compared among the three fixation conditions. Further, the association of bivariate contour ellipse area with ocular position and fusional amplitude during binocular fixation was analysed. T
SUBMITTER: Hirasawa K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6248984 | biostudies-literature | 2018
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA