Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Interpretation of differences or changes in patient-reported outcome scores should not only consider statistical significance, but also clinical relevance. Accordingly, accurate determination of the minimally important difference (MID) is crucial to assess the effectiveness of health care interventions, as well as for sample size calculation. Several methods have been proposed to determine the MID. Our aim was to review the statistical methods used to determine MID in patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires in cancer patients, focusing on the distribution- and anchor-based approaches and to present the variability of criteria used as well as possible limitations.

Methods

We performed a systematic search using PubMed. We searched for all cancer studies relate

SUBMITTER: Ousmen A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6288886 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature