Dataset Information

Why do psychiatric patients attend or not attend treatment groups in the community: A qualitative study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Non-attendance of treatment groups in the community has been a long-standing problem in mental health care. It has been found to have financial ramifications for services, worsen outcomes for those that do not attend and negatively impact on therapeutic group processes. There is a need to gain a better understanding of patients' reasons for attending or not attending. This study aimed to explore patient views on facilitators and barriers to the attendance of treatment groups in the community.

Methods

The study used interview data collected as part of three studies that investigated treatment groups for psychiatric patients in the community. Sixty-seven interview transcripts were analysed using the framework method.

Results

Five themes relating to facilitators of group attendance were identified: opportunity for autonomy; self-acknowledging need and therapist encouragement; optimal group format and safe environment; interest in content and enjoyment; actual and expected benefits of attendance. Four themes related to barriers: not being sufficiently informed; concerns about social interactions and the unknown; limited accessibility; and negative group dynamics.

Conclusion

To facilitate attendance and reduce attrition to treatment groups in the community clinicians should address patient's wishes for information, capture their interest in the group modality, and potentially offer a 'trial' session. Furthermore, they should make the group location and time as accessible as possible and create a moderately sized group of six to eight patients. In these groups, mutual respect, feelings of safety and encouragement appear essential to make patients feel they can benefit from attendance.

SUBMITTER: Dilgul M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6292613 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Why do psychiatric patients attend or not attend treatment groups in the community: A qualitative study.

Dilgul Merve M McNamee Philip P Orfanos Stavros S Carr Catherine Elizabeth CE Priebe Stefan S

PloS one 20181213 12

<h4>Background</h4>Non-attendance of treatment groups in the community has been a long-standing problem in mental health care. It has been found to have financial ramifications for services, worsen outcomes for those that do not attend and negatively impact on therapeutic group processes. There is a need to gain a better understanding of patients' reasons for attending or not attending. This study aimed to explore patient views on facilitators and barriers to the attendance of treatment groups i ...[more]

PMID: 30543646

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAggression in psychiatric hospitals has been of interest to researchers. Information on how different stakeholders perceive patient aggression remains equivocal. Even less is known about possible similarities or differences in stakeholders' perceptions of how aggressive behaviour is understood, managed and prevented in psychiatric hospitals. We aimed to explore multiple viewpoints on patient aggression, its possible causes and outcomes, and development ideas for prevention and management.MethodsA qualitative design was adopted. The data were collected using focus group interviews. A thematic approach was used for interpretation. The data were collected on 15 adult wards in two inpatient psychiatric settings in Hong Kong. Participants were nurses working on the psychiatric inpatient wards, patients admitted to the wards, and informal caregivers visiting inpatient wards (N = 94).ResultsCommonalities between all groups were found on how patient aggression is perceived, and why it occurs. Patients and especially nurses described how patient aggression occurred with no clear reason or forewarning and how patients were physically controlled or restricted after aggressive events. Only nurses and patients expressed experiencing physical burden, while all groups considered psychological burden to be a consequence of aggression. All groups proposed that helpful attitudes among nurses, better communication, structural changes, and better self-management skills would prevent patient aggression. Risk assessment was proposed only by nurses and patients, while safety measures were proposed by nurses and informal caregivers only. The use of restrictive interventions to manage aggressive events was proposed by all groups.ConclusionsDespite the complex diversity of perspectives in different stakeholder groups regarding patient aggression, the findings highlighted that it is possible to achieve some mutual understanding of aggression in psychiatric hospitals and identify areas to be developed. Staffs' attitudes and skills for engagement and communication with patients and informal caregivers should be improved. There is also still room to develop the therapeutic environment and culture toward meaningful activities during the treatment period.

Project description:Background:In health care, patient satisfaction is an attitudinal response and a pillar for quality assurance, but there is reluctance to measure it among mentally ill patients. Satisfied patients become more compliant. However, no study was done in this study area before. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the magnitude of perceived patient satisfaction and associated factor at Jimma University Medical Center, outpatient psychiatry clinic. Methods:Cross-sectional study design was conducted, and systematic random sampling technique was used to get study participants. The 24-item Mental Health Service Satisfaction Scale (a validated tool in Ethiopia) was used to assess patient satisfaction. Data was entered using Epi-data 3.1 and exported to the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 22.0 for analysis. Linear regression analysis (P < 0.05) was used to identify the association between the outcome and independent variable. Result:414 respondents participated in the study with response rate of 98%. The overall percentage of patient satisfaction was 50.3% (95% CI 48.4%-51.2%). Being male (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (? = -0.651, 95% CI (-0.969, -0.332)), having secondary and above educational status (Conclusion and Recommendation. This study found that half of the study participants are satisfied with the service. Distance from the hospital, current substance use, waiting time, and having good social support were identified as modifiable factors that can be improved through working with stakeholders to increase patient satisfaction.

Project description:BackgroundInsomnia is very common, especially among psychiatric patients in secondary care. It is experienced as a 24 h problem affecting several domains of life. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is widely regarded as the first-line treatment and often improves comorbid disorders. Despite this, many patients are not offered CBT-I. Internet based CBT for insomnia (iCBT-I) is just as effective as face-to-face treatments and could considerably increase availability. However, it is unclear whether iCBT-I is suitable for patients with more severe and comorbid psychiatric illnesses in secondary care.MethodsEleven Swedish participants (24-68 years old) in outpatient secondary psychiatric care who underwent iCBT-I treatment were interviewed. The semi-structured interviews were analysed using content analysis. The purpose was to map their experiences, motivation and suggestions for improvement.ResultsPrior to the treatment, most participants were highly motivated to take the opportunity to address their insomnia. The treatment was perceived as well-structured and interesting. The most difficult aspect was counteracting the fatigue. It was also hard to continue the treatment when faced with major life events. During this phase, contact with the therapist motivated them to continue the treatment. Several desired more face-to-face meetings. It was also motivating to gain insights into and a sense of control over sleep. Several described better sleep, improved daily routines, a more predictable everyday life and increased energy. Daytime well-being was improved in some, partly because they had more energy but also because they filled their days with more activities.ConclusionThe treatment has the potential to be very useful in secondary psychiatric care where insomnia is common and affects comorbid disorders. Psychiatric patients might have more difficulties continuing with iCBT-I treatment, but those who manage to complete the program have a good chance of obtaining benefit. Extensive psychological groundwork early in treatment is likely to pay off later when motivation is needed. Additional social support and other adjustments may also enhance treatment outcomes. Participants' stories are particularly valuable, as therapists and treatment developers receive less feedback from patients in internet-based treatments compared to face-to-face treatments.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveCommunity house hemodialysis is a submodality of home hemodialysis that enables patients to perform hemodialysis independent of nursing or medical supervision in a shared house. This study describes the perspectives and experiences of patients using community house hemodialysis in New Zealand to explore ways this dialysis modality may support the wider delivery of independent hemodialysis care.Study designQualitative semi-structured in-depth interview study.Setting & participants25 patients who had experienced community house hemodialysis. Participants were asked about why they chose community house hemodialysis and their experiences and perspectives of this.Analytical approachThematic analysis using an inductive approach.Results25 patients were interviewed (14 men and 11 women, aged 31-65 years). Most were of Māori or Pacific ethnicity and in part- or full-time employment. More than two-thirds dialyzed for 20 hours a week or more. We identified 4 themes that described patients' experiences and perspectives of choosing and using community house hemodialysis: reducing burden on family (when home is not an option, minimizing family exposure to dialysis, maintaining privacy and self-identity, reducing the costs of home hemodialysis, and gaining a reprieve from home), offering flexibility and freedom (having a normal life, maintaining employment, and facilitating travel), control of my health (building independence and self-efficacy, a place of wellness, avoiding institutionalization, and creating a culture of extended-hour dialysis), and community support (building social inclusion and supporting peers).LimitationsNon-Māori and non-Pacific patient experiences of community house hemodialysis could not be explored.ConclusionsCommunity house hemodialysis is a dialysis modality that overcomes many of the socioeconomic barriers to home hemodialysis, is socially and culturally acceptable to Māori and Pacific people, and supports extended-hour hemodialysis and thereby promotes more equitable access to best practice services. It is therefore a significant addition to independent hemodialysis options available for patients.

Project description:Background: Comorbid somatic diseases increase the death risk and affect the condition, treatment, and prognosis of older psychiatric patients. We investigated the comorbidity and drug treatment in older patients with psychosis. Methods: This retrospective study used data from 3,115 older psychiatric in-patients hospitalized at the Shanghai Mental Health Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, China discharged from 2005 to 2015. Descriptive analyses of patients' age, sex, treatment drugs, diagnoses (based on ICD-10), and time trend were performed. Results: Patients' median age was 56 (range, 50-98) years; 1,824 (58.6%) were female. The top five first-level diagnoses were schizophrenia (F20) (n = 1,818, 58.3%), depressive episode (F32) (n = 457, 14.6%), bipolar affective disorder (F31) (n = 151, 4.8%), manic episode (F30), (n = 143, 4.6%), and vascular dementia (F01) (n = 136, 4.4%). Mental (99.9%), central nervous system (85.2%), digestive system (83.5%), cardiovascular system (72.5%), and anti-infective (59.6%) drugs had the highest prescription rates. The combined use of antidepressants, anti-anxiety, anti-arrhythmic, hormones and endocrine system drugs were significantly higher in female than in male patients, while mood stabilizers and genitourinary system drugs significantly more frequent in men. With increasing age, the F20-F29 patients decreased, while F00-F09 patients increased, with the corresponding changes to prescription in those patients. In comparison to that in 2005-2010, the combined prescriptions for genitourinary and cardiovascular drugs increased between 2011 and 2015, and F00-F09 and F40-F48 older patients doubled, accordingly anti-Alzheimer's disease drugs and antidepressants more than doubled. F30-F39 patients increased by 49.1%, and anti-anxiety drugs, mood stabilizers, etc. increased by ≥50%; F20-F29 older patients decreased by 26.7%, while antipsychotics only increased by 4.4%. Conclusions: This study found the combined drug treatment of somatic diseases, particularly for central nervous, digestive, cardiovascular, respiratory and genitourinary drugs were extremely common among older psychiatric in-patients in China. With increasing age, the F20-F29 patients decreased, while F00-F09 patients increased; the antipsychotics prescriptions decreased, and almost all comorbidity drugs increased. Compared with that in 2005-2010, the older patients with all diagnosis except F20-F29 increased in 2011-2015, and the prescriptions for psychotropic, genitourinary, and cardiovascular drugs increased.

Dataset Information

Why do psychiatric patients attend or not attend treatment groups in the community: A qualitative study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Why do psychiatric patients attend or not attend treatment groups in the community: A qualitative study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets