Project description:IntroductionNRG1 rearrangements produce chimeric ligands that subvert the ERBB pathway to drive tumorigenesis. A better understanding of the signaling networks that mediate transformation by NRG1 fusions is needed to inform effective therapeutic strategies. Unfortunately, this has been hampered by a paucity of patient-derived disease models that faithfully recapitulate this molecularly defined cancer subset.MethodsPatient-derived xenograft (PDX) and cell line models were established from NRG1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma samples. Transcriptomic, proteomic, and biochemical analyses were performed to identify activated pathways. Efficacy studies were conducted to evaluate HER3- and MTOR-directed therapies.ResultsWe established a pair of PDX and cell line models of invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (LUAD-0061AS3, SLC3A2-NRG1), representing the first reported paired in vitro and in vivo model of NRG1-driven tumors. Growth of LUAD-0061AS3 models was reduced by the anti-HER3 antibody GSK2849330. Transcriptomic profiling revealed activation of the MTOR pathway in lung tumor samples with NRG1 fusions. Phosphorylation of several MTOR effectors (S6 and 4EBP1) was higher in LUAD-0061AS3 cells compared with human bronchial epithelial cells and the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-175-VII (DOC4-NRG1 fusion). Accordingly, LUAD-0061AS3 cells were more sensitive to MTOR inhibitors than MDA-MB-175-VII cells and targeting the MTOR pathway with rapamycin blocked growth of LUAD-0061AS3 PDX tumors in vivo. In contrast, MDA-MB-175-VII breast cancer cells had higher MAPK pathway activation and were more sensitive to MEK inhibition.ConclusionsWe identify the MTOR pathway as a candidate vulnerability in NRG1 fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma that may warrant further preclinical evaluation, with the eventual goal of finding additional therapeutic options for patients in whom ERBB-directed therapy fails. Moreover, our results uncover heterogeneity in downstream oncogenic signaling among NRG1-rearranged cancers, possibly tumor type-dependent, the therapeutic significance of which requires additional investigation.

Project description:BackgroundNeuregulin 1 (NRG1) fusions are recurrent oncogenic drivers found in multiple solid tumors. NRG1 binds to human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), leading to heterodimerization with HER2 and activation of downstream growth and proliferation pathways. The efficacy and safety of zenocutuzumab, a bispecific antibody against HER2 and HER3, in patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors are unclear.MethodsIn this registrational, phase 2 clinical study, we assigned patients with advanced NRG1 fusion-positive cancer involving any tumor type to receive zenocutuzumab at a dose of 750 mg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary end point was overall response (complete or partial response) according to investigator assessment. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety.ResultsA total of 204 patients with 12 tumor types were enrolled and treated. Among 158 patients who had measurable disease and were enrolled at least 24 weeks before the data-cutoff date, a response occurred in 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23 to 37). The median duration of response was 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 12.9); 19% of responses were ongoing at the data-cutoff date. Responses were observed in multiple tumor types - including in 27 of 93 patients (29%; 95% CI, 20 to 39) with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 15 of 36 patients (42%; 95% CI, 25 to 59) with pancreatic cancer - and across multiple NRG1 fusion partners. The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 9.1). Adverse events were primarily grade 1 or 2. The most common adverse events that were considered by the investigator to be related to zenocutuzumab were diarrhea (in 18% of the patients), fatigue (in 12%), and nausea (in 11%). Infusion-related reactions (composite term) were observed in 14% of the patients. One patient discontinued zenocutuzumab owing to a treatment-related adverse event.ConclusionsZenocutuzumab showed efficacy in patients with advanced NRG1 fusion-positive cancer, notably NSCLC and pancreatic cancer, with mainly low-grade adverse events. (Funded by Merus; eNRGy ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02912949.).

Project description:PurposeAlthough NRG1 fusions are oncogenic drivers across multiple tumor types including lung cancers, these are difficult to study because of their rarity. The global eNRGy1 registry was thus established to characterize NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers in the largest and most diverse series to date.MethodsFrom June 2018 to February 2020, a consortium of 22 centers from nine countries in Europe, Asia, and the United States contributed data from patients with pathologically confirmed NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers. Profiling included DNA-based and/or RNA-based next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Anonymized clinical, pathologic, molecular, and response (RECIST v1.1) data were centrally curated and analyzed.ResultsAlthough the typified never smoking (57%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (57%), and nonmetastatic (71%) phenotype predominated in 110 patients with NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancer, further diversity, including in smoking history (43%) and histology (43% nonmucinous and 6% nonadenocarcinoma), was elucidated. RNA-based testing identified most fusions (74%). Molecularly, six (of 18) novel 5' partners, 20 unique epidermal growth factor domain-inclusive chimeric events, and heterogeneous 5'/3' breakpoints were found. Platinum-doublet and taxane-based (post-platinum-doublet) chemotherapy achieved low objective response rates (ORRs 13% and 14%, respectively) and modest progression-free survival medians (PFS 5.8 and 4.0 months, respectively). Consistent with a low programmed death ligand-1 expressing (28%) and low tumor mutational burden (median: 0.9 mutations/megabase) immunophenotype, the activity of chemoimmunotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy was poor (ORR 0%/PFS 3.3 months and ORR 20%/PFS 3.6 months, respectively). Afatinib achieved an ORR of 25%, not contingent on fusion type, and a 2.8-month median PFS.ConclusionNRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers were molecularly, pathologically, and clinically more heterogeneous than previously recognized. The activity of cytotoxic, immune, and targeted therapies was disappointing. Further research examining NRG1-rearranged tumor biology is needed to develop new therapeutic strategies.

Project description:BackgroundNRG1 gene fusions may be clinically actionable, since cancers carrying the fusion transcripts can be sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The NRG1 gene encodes ligands for the HER2(ERBB2)-ERBB3 heterodimeric receptor tyrosine kinase, and the gene fusions are thought to lead to autocrine stimulation of the receptor. The NRG1 fusion expressed in the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-175 serves as a model example of such fusions, showing the proposed autocrine loop and exceptional drug sensitivity. However, its structure has not been properly characterised, its oncogenic activity has not been fully explained, and there is limited data on such fusions in breast cancer.MethodsWe analysed genomic rearrangements and transcripts of NRG1 in MDA-MB-175 and a panel of 571 breast cancers.ResultsWe found that the MDA-MB-175 fusion-originally reported as a DOC4(TENM4)-NRG1 fusion, lacking the cytoplasmic tail of NRG1-is in reality a double fusion, PPP6R3-TENM4-NRG1, producing multiple transcripts, some of which include the cytoplasmic tail. We hypothesise that many NRG1 fusions may be oncogenic not for lacking the cytoplasmic domain but because they do not encode NRG1's nuclear-localised form. The fusion in MDA-MB-175 is the result of a very complex genomic rearrangement, which we partially characterised, that creates additional expressed gene fusions, RSF1-TENM4, TPCN2-RSF1, and MRPL48-GAB2. We searched for NRG1 rearrangements in 571 breast cancers subjected to genome sequencing and transcriptome sequencing and found four cases (0.7%) with fusions, WRN-NRG1, FAM91A1-NRG1, ARHGEF39-NRG1, and ZNF704-NRG1, all splicing into NRG1 at the same exon as in MDA-MB-175. However, the WRN-NRG1 and ARHGEF39-NRG1 fusions were out of frame. We identified rearrangements of NRG1 in many more (8% of) cases that seemed more likely to inactivate than to create activating fusions, or whose outcome could not be predicted because they were complex, or both. This is not surprising because NRG1 can be pro-apoptotic and is inactivated in some breast cancers.ConclusionsOur results highlight the complexity of rearrangements of NRG1 in breast cancers and confirm that some do not activate but inactivate. Careful interpretation of NRG1 rearrangements will therefore be necessary for appropriate patient management.

Dataset Information

NRG1: a cinderella fusion in lung cancer?

Publications

<i>NRG1</i>: a cinderella fusion in lung cancer?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets