Captive jays exhibit reduced problem-solving performance compared to wild conspecifics.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Animal cognitive abilities are frequently quantified in strictly controlled settings, with laboratory-reared subjects. Results from these studies have merit for clarifying proximate mechanisms of performance and the potential upper limits of certain cognitive abilities. Researchers often assume that performance on laboratory-based assessments accurately represents the abilities of wild conspecifics, but this is infrequently tested. In this experiment, we quantified the performance of wild and captive corvid subjects on an extractive foraging task. We found that performance was not equivalent, and wild subjects were faster at problem-solving to extract the food reward. By contrast, there was no difference in the time it took for captive and wild solvers to repeat the behaviour to get additi
SUBMITTER: McCune KB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6366215 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA