Dataset Information

The fitness cost and benefit of phase-separated protein deposits.

ABSTRACT: Phase separation of soluble proteins into insoluble deposits is associated with numerous diseases. However, protein deposits can also function as membrane-less compartments for many cellular processes. What are the fitness costs and benefits of forming such deposits in different conditions? Using a model protein that phase-separates into deposits, we distinguish and quantify the fitness contribution due to the loss or gain of protein function and deposit formation in yeast. The environmental condition and the cellular demand for the protein function emerge as key determinants of fitness. Protein deposit formation can influence cell-to-cell variation in free protein abundance between individuals of a cell population (i.e., gene expression noise). This results in variable manifestation of protein function and a continuous range of phenotypes in a cell population, favoring survival of some individuals in certain environments. Thus, protein deposit formation by phase separation might be a mechanism to sense protein concentration in cells and to generate phenotypic variability. The selectable phenotypic variability, previously described for prions, could be a general property of proteins that can form phase-separated assemblies and may influence cell fitness.

SUBMITTER: Sanchez de Groot N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6452874 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The fitness cost and benefit of phase-separated protein deposits.

Sanchez de Groot Natalia N Torrent Burgas Marc M Ravarani Charles Nj CN Trusina Ala A Ventura Salvador S Babu M Madan MM

Molecular systems biology 20190408 4

Phase separation of soluble proteins into insoluble deposits is associated with numerous diseases. However, protein deposits can also function as membrane-less compartments for many cellular processes. What are the fitness costs and benefits of forming such deposits in different conditions? Using a model protein that phase-separates into deposits, we distinguish and quantify the fitness contribution due to the loss or gain of protein function and deposit formation in yeast. The environmental con ...[more]

PMID: 30962358

Similar Datasets

Project description:Solutions of the intrinsically disordered, low-complexity domain of the FUS protein (FUS-LC) undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) below temperatures TLLPS in the 20-40° C range. To investigate whether local conformational distributions are detectably different in the homogeneous and phase-separated states of FUS-LC, we performed solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) measurements on solutions that were frozen on sub-millisecond time scales after equilibration at temperatures well above (50° C) or well below (4° C) TLLPS. Measurements were performed at 25 K with signal enhancements from dynamic nuclear polarization. Crosspeak patterns in two-dimensional (2D) ssNMR spectra of rapidly frozen solutions in which FUS-LC was uniformly 15N,13C-labeled were found to be nearly identical for the two states. Similar results were obtained for solutions in which FUS-LC was labeled only at Thr, Tyr, and Gly residues, as well as solutions of a FUS construct in which five specific residues were labeled by ligation of synthetic and recombinant fragments. These experiments show that local conformational distributions are nearly the same in the homogeneous and phase-separated solutions, despite the much greater protein concentrations and more abundant intermolecular interactions within phase-separated, protein-rich "droplets". Comparison of the experimental results with simulations of the sensitivity of 2D crosspeak patterns to an enhanced population of β-strand-like conformations suggests that changes in conformational distributions are no larger than 5-10%.Statement of significanceLiquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in solutions of proteins with intrinsically disordered domains has attracted recent attention because of its relevance to multiple biological processes and its inherent interest from the standpoint of protein biophysics. The high protein concentrations and abundant intermolecular interactions within protein-rich, phase-separated "droplets" suggests that conformational distributions of intrinsically disordered proteins may differ in homogeneous and phase-separated solutions. To investigate whether detectable differences exist, we performed experiments on the low-complexity domain of the FUS protein (FUS-LC) in which FUS-LC solutions were first equilibrated at temperatures well above or well below their LLPS transition temperatures, then rapidly frozen and examined at very low temperatures by solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) spectroscopy. The ssNMR data for homogeneous and phase-separated frozen solutions of FUS-LC were found to be nearly identical, showing that LLPS is not accompanied by substantial changes in the local conformational distributions of this intrinsically disordered protein.

Dataset Information

The fitness cost and benefit of phase-separated protein deposits.

Publications

The fitness cost and benefit of phase-separated protein deposits.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets