Unknown

Dataset Information

0

How differing methods of ascribing ethnicity and socio-economic status affect risk estimates for hospitalisation with infectious disease.


ABSTRACT: Significant ethnic and socio-economic disparities exist in infectious diseases (IDs) rates in New Zealand, so accurate measures of these characteristics are required. This study compared methods of ascribing ethnicity and socio-economic status. Children in the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal cohort were ascribed to self-prioritised, total response and single-combined ethnic groups. Socio-economic status was measured using household income, and both census-derived and survey-derived deprivation indices. Rates of ID hospitalisation were compared using linked administrative data. Self-prioritised ethnicity was simplest to use. Total response accounted for mixed ethnicity and allowed overlap between groups. Single-combined ethnicity required aggregation of small groups to maintain power but offered greater detail. Regardless of the method used, Māori and Pacific children, and children in the most socio-economically deprived households had a greater risk of ID hospitalisation. Risk differences between self-prioritised and total response methods were not significant for Māori and Pacific children but single-combined ethnicity revealed a diversity of risk within these groups. Household income was affected by non-random missing data. The census-derived deprivation index offered a high level of completeness with some risk of multicollinearity and concerns regarding the ecological fallacy. The survey-derived index required extra questions but was acceptable to participants and provided individualised data. Based on these results, the use of single-combined ethnicity and an individualised survey-derived index of deprivation are recommended where sample size and data structure allow it.

SUBMITTER: Hobbs MR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6518588 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

How differing methods of ascribing ethnicity and socio-economic status affect risk estimates for hospitalisation with infectious disease.

Hobbs Mark R MR   Atatoa Carr Polly P   Fa'alili-Fidow Jacinta J   Pillai Avinesh A   Morton Susan M B SMB   Grant Cameron C CC  

Epidemiology and infection 20181113


Significant ethnic and socio-economic disparities exist in infectious diseases (IDs) rates in New Zealand, so accurate measures of these characteristics are required. This study compared methods of ascribing ethnicity and socio-economic status. Children in the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal cohort were ascribed to self-prioritised, total response and single-combined ethnic groups. Socio-economic status was measured using household income, and both census-derived and survey-derived depriv  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5253328 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9843393 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4454783 | biostudies-literature
2016-05-25 | GSE31713 | GEO
| S-EPMC7605046 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6393457 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4005746 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4107720 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7034357 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7568122 | biostudies-literature