Dataset Information

Rasagiline for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A randomized, controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Rasagiline is a monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor with possible neuroprotective effects in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Methods

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 80 ALS participants with enrichment of the placebo group with historical controls (n = 177) at 10 centers in the United States. Participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to 2 mg/day rasagiline or placebo. The primary outcome was average slope of decline on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Secondary measures included slow vital capacity, survival, mitochondrial and molecular biomarkers, and adverse-event reporting.

Results

There was no difference in the average 12-month ALSFRS-R slope between rasagiline and the mixed placebo and historical control cohorts. Rasagiline did not show signs of drug-target engagement in urine and blood biomarkers. Rasagiline was well tolerated with no serious adverse events.

Discussion

Rasagiline did not alter disease progression compared with controls over 12 months of treatment. Muscle Nerve 59:201-207, 2019.

SUBMITTER: Statland JM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6545236 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Rasagiline for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A randomized, controlled trial.

Statland Jeffrey M JM Moore Dan D Wang Yunxia Y Walsh Maureen M Mozaffar Tahseen T Elman Lauren L Nations Sharon P SP Mitsumoto Hiroshi H Fernandes J Americo JA Saperstein David D Hayat Ghazala G Herbelin Laura L Karam Chafic C Katz Jonathan J Wilkins Heather M HM Agbas Abdulbaki A Swerdlow Russell H RH Santella Regina M RM Dimachkie Mazen M MM Barohn Richard J RJ

Muscle & nerve 20181126 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>Rasagiline is a monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor with possible neuroprotective effects in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 80 ALS participants with enrichment of the placebo group with historical controls (n = 177) at 10 centers in the United States. Participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to 2 mg/day rasagiline or placebo. The primary outcome was average slope of d ...[more]

PMID: 30192007

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceTetramethylpyrazine nitrone has exhibited promising results in improving motor dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of orally administered tetramethylpyrazine nitrone in patients with ALS.Design, setting, and participantsThis phase 2, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 24, 2020, through July 14, 2023, in 11 centers in China, with a 180-day follow-up. Patients aged 45 to 70 years, with ALS onset within 2 years, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores of at least 2 points on each item, and forced vital capacity (FVC) of at least 80% were included. Patients experienced a 1- to 4-point decrease in ALSFRS-R score during a 3-month screening period.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (600 mg twice daily), high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (1200 mg twice daily), or placebo (twice daily) for 180 days.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was change in ALSFRS-R score (range of 0-48, with lower scores indicating worse function) from baseline to 180 days. The secondary outcomes were changes in FVC, grip strength, ALS Assessment Questionnaire-40 (ALSAQ-40) score, and end point events. Safety outcomes included adverse events.ResultsA total of 155 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [6.5] years; 115 men [74.2%]) were randomized (51 [32.9%] to the low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone group, 52 [33.6%] to the high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone group, and 52 [33.6%] to the placebo group). No significant differences were observed in ALSFRS-R score changes between low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (least squares [LS] mean difference, -0.89 points; 95% CI -3.25 to 1.48 points) and high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (LS mean difference, -0.20 points; 95% CI -2.48 to 2.07 points) compared with placebo. High-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone showed a significantly slower decline in grip strength at day 180 (LS mean difference, 2.46 kg; 95% CI, 0.15-4.76 kg). In a subgroup of patients younger than 65 years with slower disease progression, tetramethylpyrazine nitrone significantly attenuated the decline in grip strength (LS mean difference, 3.63 kg; 95% CI, 0.84-6.41 kg), bulbar scores (LS mean difference, 0.66 points; 95% CI, 0.03-1.29 points), and respiratory scores (LS mean difference, 0.54 points; 95% CI, 0.03-1.06 points). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, with no severe treatment-related adverse events or deaths.Conclusions and relevanceThis randomized clinical trial demonstrates that tetramethylpyrazine nitrone is safe and well-tolerated in patients with ALS. There was no difference in the primary end point across the low-dose, high-dose, and placebo groups, with significant benefits in a subgroup of younger patients with slower disease progression.Trial registrationChiCTR Identifier: ChiCTR2000039689.

Project description:BackgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease that causes paralysis of limb, swallowing, and breathing muscles. Riluzole, the Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for ALS, provides minimal benefit, prolonging patient life by only 2-3 months. Previous studies have found a neuro-protective and anti-neuroinflammatory effect of Mecasin, with retrospective studies providing suggestive evidence for a beneficial effect of Mecasin. The aim of this study was to develop a protocol to determine the proper dosage of Mecasin.MethodsThis is a phase II-A, multi-center, randomized study with three arms. Thirty-six patients with ALS will be randomly assigned to one of three groups, each receiving the standard treatment with 100 mg of riluzole in addition to one of 1.6 g of Mecasin, 2.4 g of Mecasin, or a placebo. The Primary outcome is the Korean version of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised result after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes include results of the Short Form Health Survey-8, Medical Research Council Scale, Visual Analogue Scale for Pain, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Fatigue Severity Scale, Patient Global Impression of Change, pulmonary function test, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and its ratio to forced vital capacity, creatine kinase, and body weight. The frequencies of total adverse events and serious adverse events will be described and documented. The trial protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Wonkwang University Gwangju and Sanbon Hospital (2016-5-4 and 2016-34-01, respectively). An Investigational New Drug status (30731) was granted by the Korea Food and Drug Administration.DiscussionThis trial will aim to identify the optimal dosage of Mecasin. Additionally, it will test the efficacy and safety of Mecasin in conjunction with standard treatment, riluzole, for alleviating the functional decline in patients with ALS.Trial registrationKorean National Clinical Trial Registry CRIS; KCT0001984 . Registered on 28 July 2016.

Project description:Background and objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term physiologic effect and one-year functional effect of a 12-week inspiratory and expiratory respiratory strength training (RST) program in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).MethodsA double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial was conducted in 45 individuals with early-stage ALS. Participants were randomized into 12 weeks of active RST (30% load, n = 23) or sham RST (0% load, n = 22). An intent-to-treat analysis was conducted. Linear regression of pre-post change with group status and pretest scores as predictors was conducted. Primary outcomes included maximum expiratory and inspiratory pressure (MEP, MIP), and secondary outcomes were cough spirometry and forced vital capacity. Exploratory follow-up outcomes included one-year global and bulbar decline (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised [ALSFRS-R] total and bulbar subscale slope), oral intake status, and time to noninvasive ventilation (NIV).ResultsTheRST completion rate was 91% with no RST-related adverse events. A 12-week RST program led to increases in MEP (p = 0.004), but not MIP (p = 0.33). On average, MEP increased by 20.8 cm H2O after active RST (95% CI +7.6 to +33.9) and decreased by 1.0 cm H2O (95% CI -9.1 to +7.2) after sham RST. Mean MIP increased by 8.9 cm H2O (95% CI +1.5 to +16.3) and 4.8 cm H2O (95% CI -0.6 to +10.2) for the active and sham groups, respectively. Regarding secondary outcomes, RST led to significant increases in cough peak inspiratory flow (p = 0.02); however, it did not affect cough expiratory flow (p = 0.06) or FVC (p = 0.60). Regarding 12-month outcomes, a significant difference in the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale slope was observed across treatment groups, with a more than two-fold faster rate of bulbar decline in the sham vs active RST groups observed (-0.29 vs -0.12 points/month, p = 0.02). Total ALSFRS-R slope, feeding status, and time to NIV did not differ across treatment groups (p > 0.05).DiscussionRST was well tolerated and led to improvements in some, but not all, short and long-term outcomes. RST represents a proactive rehabilitative intervention that could increase physiologic capacity of specific breathing and airway clearance functions during the early stages of ALS. Further work is needed to determine optimal training intensity, resistance load specifications, and potential long-term functional outcomes.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that a mild-intensity respiratory strength training program improves maximum expiratory pressure, but not maximum inspiratory pressure, in patients with early-stage ALS.

Dataset Information

Rasagiline for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A randomized, controlled trial.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Rasagiline for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A randomized, controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets