Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
To compare the effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence.Design
Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies
Randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.Methods
Identification of relevant randomised controlled trials from Cochrane reviews and the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register (searched May 2017), which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Medline In-Process, Medline Epub Ahead of Print, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. The reference lists of relevant articles were also searched. Primary outco
SUBMITTER: Imamura M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6549286 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature