Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Stringent requirements exist regarding the transparency of the study selection process and the reliability of results. A 2-step selection process is generally recommended; this is conducted by 2 reviewers independently of each other (conventional double-screening). However, the approach is resource intensive, which can be a problem, as systematic reviews generally need to be completed within a defined period with a limited budget. The aim of the following methodological systematic review was to analyse the evidence available on whether single screening is equivalent to double screening in the screening process conducted in systematic reviews. METHODS:We searched Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Methodology Register (last search 10/2018). We also used supplementary search techniq

SUBMITTER: Waffenschmidt S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6599339 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature