Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
The aim of this study was to investigate whether algorithmic interpretation (AI) of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) pressure-wire pull back data would be noninferior to expert human interpretation.Background
Interpretation of iFR pressure-wire pull back data can be complex and is subjective.Methods
Fifteen human experts interpreted 1,008 iFR pull back traces (691 unique, 317 duplicate). For each trace, experts determined the hemodynamic appropriateness for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and, in such cases, the optimal physiological strategy for PCI. The heart team (HT) interpretation was determined by consensus of the individual expert opinions. The same 1,008 pull back traces were also interpreted algorithmically. The coprimary hypotheses o
SUBMITTER: Cook CM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6645043 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature