Dataset Information

Microscopic versus Endoscopic Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty.

ABSTRACT:

Background and objectives

Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty makes the graft easy, and reduces operating time. The present study aimed to investigate the outcomes of microscopic versus endoscopic inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty.

Subjects and methods

In this retrospective study, the outcomes of 63 patients who underwent inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty with small to medium chronic tympanic membrane perforation were evaluated. Twenty-four patients underwent conventional microscopic tympanoplasty and 39 underwent endoscopic tympanoplasty. The outcomes were analyzed in terms of the hearing gain and graft success rate.

Results

The surgical success rate was 95.8% in the patients who underwent conventional microscopic tympanoplasty and 92.3% in those who underwent endoscopic tympanoplasty. In both groups of patients, the postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was significantly lower than the preoperative ABG. There were no significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative ABG values in either group.

Conclusions

Endoscopic inlay tympanoplasty using the butterfly cartilage technique appears to be an effective alternative to microscopic tympanoplasty and results in excellent hearing.

SUBMITTER: Lee SA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6646895 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Microscopic versus Endoscopic Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty.

Lee Se A SA Kang Hyun Tag HT Lee Yun Ji YJ Kim Bo Gyung BG Lee Jong Dae JD

Journal of audiology & otology 20190625 3

<h4>Background and objectives</h4>Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty makes the graft easy, and reduces operating time. The present study aimed to investigate the outcomes of microscopic versus endoscopic inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty.<h4>Subjects and methods</h4>In this retrospective study, the outcomes of 63 patients who underwent inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty with small to medium chronic tympanic membrane perforation were evaluated. Twenty-four patients underwent conve ...[more]

PMID: 31234245

Similar Datasets

Project description:To compare the results of myringoplasty by using operating microscope (postaural) with that of myringoplasty by using endoscope (permeatal). Our study was conducted in Department of ENT of in Chirayu Medical College and Hospital. Total 60 patients of age group 18-60 were taken for study having chronic otitis media or trauma with central perforation. Patients were randomly selected microscopic or endoscopic myringoplasty. 30 patients for Microscopic Myringoplasty and 30 patients for endoscopic Myringoplasty were selected. Out of total 60 patients 35 were females and the 25 were males, 27 were in the age group 15-30 and 23 were in age group 31-45 and only 10 in the age group of 46-60. 18-30 age group cohort was predominant. The average time taken for endoscopic myringoplasty was 65.5 ± 3.45 min and for microscopic myringoplasty 85.7 ± 3.42 min. 26 were having Large central perforation (LCP), of which 13 underwent microscopic and 13 underwent endoscopic myringoplasty. The graft was taken up in situ in 22 patients while 4 patients had small residual central perforation. Out of these four residual perforations 3 were done by endoscopy and 1 by microscopy. 19 (of 60) were having Medium size central perforation (MCP), 10 were operated with endoscope and 9 with microscope. 15 (60) were having Small central perforation (SCP), 7 done with endoscope and 8 with microscope. In all patient graft take up was well. Large central perforation present in maximum patient and had least graft uptake as compared to MCP and SCP. Out of the 30 these endoscopic myringoplasty 27 patients had good graft uptake and 3 had small central residual perforation after 3 months. Out of the 30 microscopic myringoplasty 29 patients had good graft uptake and 1 patient had small central residual perforation after 3 months. In our study pre operative and post operative Air Bone Gaps (ABGs) were 22.05 ± 2.04 and 9.05 ± 1.36 db respectively in endoscopic myringoplasty and 21.81 ± 1.85 and 8.55 ± 1.44 db respectively in microscopic myringoplasty. Microscopic myringoplasty has greater success rate in larger perforations that is LCP and MCP and equal result in SCP. Advantage of microscope is depth perception and both hands are free for procedure which is limitation of endoscopic myringoplasty (need to use endoscope holder). Advantage of endoscopic permeatal myringoplasty is superior visualization, least tissue trauma and better cosmetic outcome, almost equal graft uptake and hearing outcome with less operative time. Endoscope system is portable, so convenient for surgeon where microscope is not available. Also endoscope is a less costly armamentarium. Our study shows better result in myringoplasty can be achieved if both methods of surgery are used in combination.

Project description:The aim of the study was to compare anatomical and functional outcomes of temporalis fascia graft versus tragal cartilage graft in type 1 tympanoplasty in paediatric patients. A prospective, comparative and randomised study. A detailed history was taken from all the patients visiting the ENT OP dept after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criterion patients were enrolled for the study. Written and informed consent was taken for all the patients from legally acceptable guardians. Preoperative assessment was done and the patients were subjected to type1 tympanoplasty with Temporalis fascia graft or tragal cartilage graft. All the patients were followed up on the third, sixth postoperative months to assess hearing improvement. All the patients were followed up on the first and third,sixth postoperative months for graft status with otoscopic examination. In the present study out of 80 patients, 40 patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia and the remaining 40 patients with tragal cartilage. Both groups were assessed postoperatively for anatomical and functional success with maximum follow up of six months. There was no statistical significance between the outcome and the age or site and size of tympanic membrane perforation. Both groups had comparable graft success rate and hearing improvement. The cartilage group had a higher anatomical success rate. The functional outcome was similar. However, there was no statistically significant difference found in the outcome of two groups. Tympanoplasty can be performed in a paediatric age group with a good success rate in suitable patients. It can be done at an early age,safely with good anatomical and functional outcomes. The age group, site or size of perforation, the type of graft used for tympanoplasty does not alter the anatomical or functional outcome significantly.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03490-1.

Dataset Information

Microscopic versus Endoscopic Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty.

Background and objectives

Subjects and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Microscopic versus Endoscopic Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets