Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias-variance trade-off.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Breakthroughs in machine learning are rapidly changing science and society, yet our fundamental understanding of this technology has lagged far behind. Indeed, one of the central tenets of the field, the bias-variance trade-off, appears to be at odds with the observed behavior of methods used in modern machine-learning practice. The bias-variance trade-off implies that a model should balance underfitting and overfitting: Rich enough to express underlying structure in data and simple enough to avoid fitting spurious patterns. However, in modern practice, very rich models such as neural networks are trained to exactly fit (i.e., interpolate) the data. Classically, such models would be considered overfitted, and yet they often obtain high accuracy on test data. This apparent contradiction has
SUBMITTER: Belkin M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6689936 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA