Impacts of inter-trial interval duration on a computational model of sign-tracking vs. goal-tracking behaviour.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: In the context of Pavlovian conditioning, two types of behaviour may emerge within the population (Flagel et al. Nature, 469(7328): 53-57, 2011). Animals may choose to engage either with the conditioned stimulus (CS), a behaviour known as sign-tracking (ST) which is sensitive to dopamine inhibition for its acquisition, or with the food cup in which the reward or unconditioned stimulus (US) will eventually be delivered, a behaviour known as goal-tracking (GT) which is dependent on dopamine for its expression only. Previous work by Lesaint et al. (PLoS Comput Biol, 10(2), 2014) offered a computational explanation for these phenomena and led to the prediction that varying the duration of the inter-trial interval (ITI) would change the relative ST-GT proportion in the population as well as pha
SUBMITTER: Cinotti F
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6695359 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA