Project description:Video 1EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a rendezvous technique to enable cholangioscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy of left intrahepatic duct stones.

| S-EPMC8819623 | biostudies-literature

EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy and transgastric per-oral pancreatoscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy in a patient with chronic hereditary pancreatitis and several intraductal stones.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6095689 | biostudies-literature

Long-term outcomes of pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy for the treatment of obstructive pancreatic duct stones.

Project description:Background and study aims Pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) has proven to be an effective first-line therapy in symptomatic chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients with obstructing pancreatic duct (PD) stones 1 . However, long-term outcomes of endoscopic EHL remain unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term treatment effects of EHL as first-line therapy and to compare with those obtained in a historical cohort of patients who underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) as primary treatment. Patients and methods An observational retrospective single-center long-term follow-up study was performed including 19 consecutive patients who previously underwent endoscopic EHL compared to 18 patients who underwent ESWL followed by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). The primary endpoint was long-term treatment success after EHL or ESWL defined as no recurrence of symptomatic intraductal stones confirmed on imaging. Secondary endpoints for the EHL-population included long-term clinical success (i. e., a similar or lower Izbicki Pain Score or reduction in opiate usage as compared to 6-month follow-up), quality of life (QoL), pancreatic function and hospital re-admission rate. Results In the EHL group, 37 % of the patients developed recurrent symptomatic PD stones versus 61 % in the ESWL group after a median follow-up of 35.0 and 76.5 months. Of the patients with recurrence, 71 % versus 100 % underwent a reintervention. Median time to recurrence was 12.0 versus 13.0 months. Clinical success sustained in 58 % of the EHL patients. QoL was not significantly different compared with 6-month follow-up and baseline. Conclusions Also at long-term follow-up, endoscopic EHL as first-line treatment is moderately effective for symptomatic CP patients with treatment success rates that seems at least equally effective as ESWL.

| S-EPMC10038745 | biostudies-literature

Definitive nonsurgical management of stump cholecystitis with EUS-guided lumen-apposing metal stent placement and electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

Project description:Video 1Definitive nonsurgical management of stump cholecystitis with EUS-guided lumen-apposing metal stent placement and electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

| S-EPMC10183644 | biostudies-literature

EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: practical tips and tricks.

Project description:Background and aimsEUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has gained traction as a reliable and safe method for definitive biliary drainage in patients who cannot undergo traditional transampullary procedures. Many of the newly developed single-stage devices are not yet approved for clinical use in Western practice.MethodsWe highlight key clinical and technical aspects of EUS-HGS using devices that are currently available in Western countries. The article is a comprehensive step-by-step technical review of EUS-HGS, and the video demonstrates high-level tips to overcome commonly encountered procedural challenges.ResultsPatients with biliary obstruction underwent EUS-HGS at our center. The technical difficulties that were encountered are highlighted in the article and the accompanying video. The article and video provide a detailed review of (1) preprocedural considerations, (2) puncture site selection, (3) biliary puncture, (4) contrast injection, (5) guidewire manipulation, (6) tract dilation, and (7) stent placement.ConclusionAn understanding and implementation of the technical nuances highlighted in this article should help Western endoscopists navigate the complexities of EUS-HGS and ensure optimal outcomes.

| S-EPMC11489514 | biostudies-literature

Right-sided EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with delayed stent migration treated with surgical removal (with video).

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8887035 | biostudies-literature

Early cholangioscopy-assisted electrohydraulic lithotripsy in difficult biliary stones is cost-effective.

Project description:Background and aimsSingle-operator cholangioscopy-assisted electrohydraulic lithotripsy (SOC-EHL) is effective and safe in difficult choledocholithiasis. The optimal timing of SOC-EHL use, however, in refractory stones has not been elucidated. The following aims to determine the most cost-effective timing of SOC-EHL introduction in the management of choledocholithiasis.MethodsA cost-effectiveness model was developed assessing three strategies with a progressively delayed introduction of SOC-EHL. Probability estimates of patient pathways were obtained from a systematic review. The unit of effectiveness is complete ductal clearance without need for surgery. Cost is expressed in 2018 US dollars and stem from outpatient US databases.ResultsThe three strategies achieved comparable ductal clearance rates ranging from 97.3% to 99.7%. The least expensive strategy is to perform SOC-EHL during the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiography pancreatography (ERCP) (SOC-1: 18,506$). The strategy of postponing the use of SOC-EHL to the third ERCP (SOC-3) is more expensive (US$18,895) but is 2% more effective. (0.9967). SOC-EHL during the second ERCP in the model (SOC-2) is the least cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses show altered conclusions according to the cost of SOC-EHL, effectiveness of conventional ERCP, and altered willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds with early SOC-1 being the most optimal approach below a WTP cut-off of US$20,295.ConclusionsEarly utilization of SOC-EHL (SOC-1) in difficult choledocholithiasis may be the least costly strategy with an effectiveness approximating those achieved with a delayed approach where one or more conventional ERCP(s) are reattempted prior to SOC-EHL introduction.

| S-EPMC8600178 | biostudies-literature

B2 puncture with forward-viewing EUS simplifies EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video).

Project description:Background and objectivesEUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is in widespread use; however, there are few dedicated devices. The B2 route is technically easier than the B3 route for guidewire insertion, dilation, and stenting but if performed with conventional oblique-viewing (OV) EUS, B2 puncture can cause transesophageal puncture and severe adverse events. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of forward-viewing (FV) EUS, which we have developed to improve safety for B2 puncture in EUS-HGS (B2-EUS-HGS).Patients and methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 61 consecutive patients who underwent B2-EUS-HGS with FV between February 2020 and March 2021 at Aichi Cancer Center, Japan. The patients were prospectively enrolled, and clinical data were retrospectively collected for these 61 cases.ResultsThe overall technical success rate of EUS-HGS was 98.3% (60/61). The rate of EUS-HGS with FV was 95.0% (58/61) after three cases converted to OV, and that of B2-EUS-HGS with FV was 88.5% (54/61). The early adverse event rate was 6.5% (4/61). There were no instances of transesophageal puncture. Median procedure time was 24 min (range, 8-70), and no patient required cautery dilation.ConclusionsB2-EUS-HGS can be performed safely using FV, without transesophageal puncture, and supportability of the device is improved as FV is coaxial with the guidewire. FV was efficacious in B2-EUS-HGS, which shows promise for clinical application in the future.

| S-EPMC9526104 | biostudies-literature

Overtube-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy through digital cholangioscopy for difficult biliary stones in a postoperative patient: challenging points with salvage techniques.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7804995 | biostudies-literature