Selective reporting bias in randomised controlled trials from two network meta-analyses: comparison of clinical trial registrations and their respective publications.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To determine (i) the difference in the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in trial registrations and their respective primary publications and (ii) the effect of adding SAE data from registries to a network meta-analysis (NMA) in changing the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve values of interventions. DESIGN:Secondary analysis of primary publications from two NMAs. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES:We included randomised trials published in English after 2005 that were included in two NMAs of pharmacological interventions for Alzheimer's disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DATA EXTRACTION:Two reviewers independently searched multiple international trial registries for registration status and abstracted data from the include

SUBMITTER: Wong EK 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6731894 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature