A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To identify patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), assess their validity and reliability, and assess any bias in the study design of PREM validity and reliability testing.

Data sources/study setting

Articles reporting on PREM development and testing sourced from MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus databases up to March 13, 2018.

Study design

Systematic review.

Data collection/extraction methods

Critical appraisal of PREM study design was undertaken using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). Critical appraisal of PREM validity and reliability was undertaken using a revised version of the COSMIN checklist.

Principal findings

Eighty-eight PREMs were identified, spanning across four main health care contexts. PREM validity and reli

SUBMITTER: Bull C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6736915 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature