Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
This study was designed to review the methodology and reporting of gastric cancer prognostic models and identify potential problems in model development.Methods
This systematic review was conducted following the CHARMS checklist. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Information on patient characteristics, methodological details, and models' performance was extracted. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the methodological and reporting quality.Results
In total, 101 model developments and 32 external validations were included. The median (range) of training sample size, number of death, and number of final predictors were 360 (29 to 15320), 193 (14 to 9560), and 5 (2 to 53), respectively. Ninety-one models were developed from routine clinical data. St
SUBMITTER: Feng Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6766665 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature