Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Diagnostic accuracy of midkine on hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate the dependability and accuracy of midkine (MK) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine disc and grey literature sources were searched from the date of database inception to January 2019. Two authors (B-H.Z. and B.L.) independently extracted the data and evaluated the study quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were estimated using a bivariate model. Moreover, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) were pooled using a univariate model.

Results

Nine articles (11 studies) were included (1941 participants). The bivariate analysis revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of MK for HCC diagnosis were 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.88), respectively. We also found a LR+ of 5.05 (95% CI 3.33-7.40), a LR- of 0.18 (95% CI 0.11-0.28), a DOR of 31.74 (95% CI 13.98-72.09) and an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.99). Subgroup analyses showed that MK provided the best efficiency for HCC diagnosis when the cutoff value was greater than 0.5 ng/mL.

Conclusions

MK has an excellent diagnostic value for hepatocellular carcinoma.

SUBMITTER: Zhang BH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6786585 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Diagnostic accuracy of midkine on hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Zhang Bo-Han BH   Li Bo B   Kong Ling-Xiang LX   Yan Lv-Nan LN   Yang Jia-Yin JY  

PloS one 20191010 10


<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the dependability and accuracy of midkine (MK) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine disc and grey literature sources were searched from the date of database inception to January 2019. Two authors (B-H.Z. and B.L.) independently extracted the data and evaluated the study quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The sensitivity, specificity, positive  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6314491 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4878793 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2716871 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5501560 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7531263 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4583855 | biostudies-literature