Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Reproductive skew in cooperative breeding: Environmental variability, antagonistic selection, choice, and control.


ABSTRACT: A multitude of factors may determine reproductive skew among cooperative breeders. One explanation, derived from inclusive fitness theory, is that groups can partition reproduction such that subordinates do at least as well as noncooperative solitary individuals. The majority of recent data, however, fails to support this prediction; possibly because inclusive fitness models cannot easily incorporate multiple factors simultaneously to predict skew. Notable omissions are antagonistic selection (across generations, genes will be in both dominant and subordinate bodies), constraints on the number of sites suitable for successful reproduction, choice in which group an individual might join, and within-group control or suppression of competition. All of these factors and more are explored through agent-based evolutionary simulations. The results suggest the primary drivers for the initial evolution of cooperative breeding may be a combination of limited suitable sites, choice across those sites, and parental manipulation of offspring into helping roles. Antagonistic selection may be important when subordinates are more frequent than dominants. Kinship matters, but its main effect may be in offspring being available for manipulation while unrelated individuals are not. The greater flexibility of evolutionary simulations allows the incorporation of species-specific life histories and ecological constraints to better predict sociobiology.

SUBMITTER: Nonacs P 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6787806 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Reproductive skew in cooperative breeding: Environmental variability, antagonistic selection, choice, and control.

Nonacs Peter P  

Ecology and evolution 20190904 18


A multitude of factors may determine reproductive skew among cooperative breeders. One explanation, derived from inclusive fitness theory, is that groups can partition reproduction such that subordinates do at least as well as noncooperative solitary individuals. The majority of recent data, however, fails to support this prediction; possibly because inclusive fitness models cannot easily incorporate multiple factors simultaneously to predict skew. Notable omissions are antagonistic selection (a  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC2329606 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3757966 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3780853 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6689588 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4614779 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1691690 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5568700 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7657858 | biostudies-literature