Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Implementation of evidence-based peri-operative nutrition in the U.S. is poorly described and hypothesized to be suboptimal. This study broadly describes practices and attitudes regarding nutrition screening/intervention in U.S. gastrointestinal and oncologic surgeons.Methods
Nationwide nutritional practice survey of GI/Oncologic surgical faculty.Results
Program response rates were 57% and 81% for colorectal and oncology fellowships, respectively. Only 38% had formal nutritional screening processes in place. Average estimated percent of patients malnourished, receiving nutritional screening, and receiving nutritional supplementation preoperatively were 28%, 43%, and 21%, respectively. University-affiliation (p = 0.0371) and a formal screening process (p =
SUBMITTER: Williams JD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6814259 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature