Dataset Information

Diagnostic Accuracy of Early Secretory Antigenic Target-6-Free Interferon-gamma Release Assay Compared to QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Early secretory antigenic target-6 (ESAT-6) is an immunodominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) antigen included in novel vaccines against tuberculosis (TB) and in interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs). Therefore, the availability of an ESAT-6-free IGRA is essential to determine M.tb infection status following vaccination with ESAT-6-containing vaccines. We aimed to qualify a recently developed ESAT-6-free IGRA and to assess its diagnostic performance in comparison to QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT).

Methods

Participants with different levels of M.tb exposure and TB disease were enrolled to determine the ESAT-6-free IGRA cutoff, test assay performance in independent cohorts compared to standard QFT, and perform a technical qualification of antigen-coated blood collection tubes.

Results

ESAT-6-free IGRA antigen recognition was evaluated in QFT-positive and QFT-negative South African adolescents. The ESAT-6-free IGRA cutoff was established at 0.61 IU/mL, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis in M.tb-unexposed controls and microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB patients. In an independent cohort of healthy adolescents, levels of IFN-γ released in QFT and ESAT-6-free IGRA were highly correlated (P < .0001, r = 0.83) and yielded comparable positivity rates, 41.5% and 43.5%, respectively, with 91% concordance between the tests (kappa = 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.90; McNemar test P = .48). ESAT-6-free IGRA blood collection tubes had acceptable lot-to-lot variability, precision, and stability.

Conclusions

The novel ESAT-6-free IGRA had diagnostic accuracy comparable to QFT and is suitable for use in clinical trials to assess efficacy of candidate TB vaccines to prevent established M.tb infection.

SUBMITTER: Nemes E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6821223 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Diagnostic Accuracy of Early Secretory Antigenic Target-6-Free Interferon-gamma Release Assay Compared to QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube.

Nemes Elisa E Abrahams Deborah D Scriba Thomas J TJ Ratangee Frances F Keyser Alana A Makhethe Lebohang L Erasmus Mzwandile M Mabwe Simbarashe S Bilek Nicole N Rozot Virginie V Geldenhuys Hennie H Hatherill Mark M Lempicki Maria D MD Holm Line Lindebo LL Bogardus Leah L Ginsberg Ann M AM Blauenfeldt Thomas T Smith Bronwyn B Ellis Ruth D RD Loxton Andre G AG Walzl Gerhard G Andersen Peter P Ruhwald Morten M

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20191001 10

<h4>Background</h4>Early secretory antigenic target-6 (ESAT-6) is an immunodominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) antigen included in novel vaccines against tuberculosis (TB) and in interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs). Therefore, the availability of an ESAT-6-free IGRA is essential to determine M.tb infection status following vaccination with ESAT-6-containing vaccines. We aimed to qualify a recently developed ESAT-6-free IGRA and to assess its diagnostic performance in compariso ...[more]

PMID: 30668657

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: QuantiFERON-TB-Gold-in-tube (QFT-GIT) is an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection. Limited data exists on performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus (QFT-Plus), a next generation of IGRA that includes an additional antigen tube 2 (TB2) while excluding TB7.7 from antigen tube 1 (TB1), to measure TB specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes responses. We compared agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT among highly TB exposed goldminers in South Africa. Methods: We enrolled HIV-negative goldminers in South Africa, aged ≥33 years with no prior history of TB disease or evidence of silicosis. Blood samples were collected for QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus. QFT-GIT was considered positive if TB1 tested positive; while QFT-Plus was positive if both or either TB1 or TB2 tested positive, as per manufacturer's recommendations. We compared the agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT using Cohen's Kappa. To assess the specific contribution of CD8+ T-cells, we used TB2-TB1 differential values as an indirect estimate. A cut-off value was set at 0.6. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having TB2-TB1>0.6 difference on QFT-Plus. Results: Of 349 enrolled participants, 304 had QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT results: 205 (68%) were positive on both assays; 83 (27%) were negative on both assays while 16 (5%) had discordant results. Overall, there was 94.7% (288/304) agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT (Kappa = 0.87). 214 had positive QFT-Plus result, of whom 202 [94.4%, median interquartile range (IQR): 3.06 (1.31, 7.00)] were positive on TB1 and 205 [95.8%, median (IQR): 3.25 (1.53, 8.02)] were positive on TB2. A TB2-TB1>0.6 difference was observed in 16.4% (35/214), with some evidence of a difference by BMI; 14.9% (7/47), 9.8% (9/92) and 25.3% (19/75) for BMI of 18.5-24.9, 18.5-25 and >30 kg/m 2, respectively (P=0.03). Conclusion: In a population of HIV-negative goldminers, QFT-Plus showed high agreement with QFT-GIT, suggesting similar performance.

Project description:Urgent improvements in the diagnosis and management of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are required to reach End TB goals. Conventional interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), such as QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), require substantial laboratory infrastructure and large blood volumes, limiting use in high-burden settings. The QIAreach QuantiFERON-TB (QIAreach QFT) was developed to overcome these challenges but has not previously been evaluated in field conditions in a low-income, high-burden country, or at scale in children. We performed a diagnostic evaluation of QIAreach QFT against QFT-Plus, in a cross-sectional IGRA survey in Blantyre, Malawi. We recruited a population-representative sample of children aged 1-4 years and adolescents and adults aged 10-40 years, from households and primary care. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa for QIAreach QFT against QFT-Plus, and constructed Bayesian hurdle-categorical models to compare quantitative test results. A total of 1,049 participants were recruited (64%: 1-4 years; 13%: 10-19 years; and 23%: 20-40 years). More participants had a positive QIAreach QFT result (32%) compared to QFT-Plus (15%). Over half of positive QIAreach QFT results had time-to-positivity of exactly 20 min, the assay cutoff. There was minimal agreement between QFT-Plus and QIAreach QFT results (κ = 0.26), which was lowest in children aged 1-4 years (κ = 0.13). Sensitivity and specificity of QIAreach QFT relative to QFT-Plus were 62% and 74%, respectively, with poor correlation between quantitative results. The suboptimal performance of QIAreach QFT, particularly in young children, suggests that it cannot currently be recommended for wider use and that the urgent need for an accessible test of Mtb infection remains unmet.ImportanceAlmost a quarter of the world's population has evidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. Monitoring and addressing this substantial burden of so-called "latent" tuberculosis (TB) infection will be critical to reach End TB targets. However, current interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) for Mtb infection are costly, and require a large volume of venous blood and significant laboratory processing, which are major barriers to their wider use in low-income countries. The novel QIAreach QuantiFERON-TB (QIAreach) assay has been designed as a more accessible alternative. We sought to evaluate it against a reference standard of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, in a large cross-sectional survey in Blantyre, Malawi. To our knowledge, this is the first diagnostic evaluation of QIAreach QFT to be performed in a population-based survey in a low-income high-incidence setting, and to specifically focus on young children (a priority group for interventions targeting Mtb infection). In contrast to previous studies in other settings, we observed poor performance of QIAreach QFT, particularly in young children where there was little correlation between the novel test and the reference standard. This leads us to conclude that this test cannot be widely recommended for use in its current form; indeed manufacture is currently suspended. We believe our findings are of urgent importance to policymakers, clinicians, and researchers and underscore the importance of careful evaluation of new diagnostics in the contexts where they are intended to be used.

Project description:BackgroundThe QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) is a viable alternative to the tuberculin skin test (TST) for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. However, within-subject variability may limit test utility. To assess variability, we compared results from the same subjects when QFT-GIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed in different laboratories.MethodsSubjects were recruited at two sites and blood was tested in three labs. Two labs used the same type of automated ELISA workstation, 8-point calibration curves, and electronic data transfer. The third lab used a different automated ELISA workstation, 4-point calibration curves, and manual data entry. Variability was assessed by interpretation agreement and comparison of interferon-? (IFN-?) measurements. Data for subjects with discordant interpretations or discrepancies in TB Response >0.05 IU/mL were verified or corrected, and variability was reassessed using a reconciled dataset.ResultsNinety-seven subjects had results from three labs. Eleven (11.3%) had discordant interpretations and 72 (74.2%) had discrepancies >0.05 IU/mL using unreconciled results. After correction of manual data entry errors for 9 subjects, and exclusion of 6 subjects due to methodological errors, 7 (7.7%) subjects were discordant. Of these, 6 (85.7%) had all TB Responses within 0.25 IU/mL of the manufacturer's recommended cutoff. Non-uniform error of measurement was observed, with greater variation in higher IFN-? measurements. Within-subject standard deviation for TB Response was as high as 0.16 IU/mL, and limits of agreement ranged from -0.46 to 0.43 IU/mL for subjects with mean TB Response within 0.25 IU/mL of the cutoff.ConclusionGreater interlaboratory variability was associated with manual data entry and higher IFN-? measurements. Manual data entry should be avoided. Because variability in measuring TB Response may affect interpretation, especially near the cutoff, consideration should be given to developing a range of values near the cutoff to be interpreted as "borderline," rather than negative or positive.

Dataset Information

Diagnostic Accuracy of Early Secretory Antigenic Target-6-Free Interferon-gamma Release Assay Compared to QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Diagnostic Accuracy of Early Secretory Antigenic Target-6-Free Interferon-gamma Release Assay Compared to QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets