Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To assess the effect of disclosing authors' conflict of interest declarations to peer reviewers at a medical journal. DESIGN:Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:Manuscript review process at the Annals of Emergency Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Reviewers (n=838) who reviewed manuscripts submitted between 2 June 2014 and 23 January 2018 inclusive (n=1480 manuscripts). INTERVENTION:Reviewers were randomized to either receive (treatment) or not receive (control) authors' full International Committee of Medical Journal Editors format conflict of interest disclosures before reviewing manuscripts. Reviewers rated the manuscripts as usual on eight quality ratings and were then surveyed to obtain "counterfactual scores"-that is, the scores they believed they would have given had they been assi
SUBMITTER: John LK
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6833969 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA