Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Reporting of Protocol Rationale and Content Validity in Randomized Clinical Trials of T'ai Chi: A Systematic Evaluation.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Mind-body exercise interventions are typically multimodal, complex, and pluralistic, and few have been developed with the goal of therapeutically targeting a specific medical population. It is thus important that clinical trials evaluating mind-body interventions provide some justification for the use of the specific protocol being evaluated.

Objectives

This article reports the results of a systematic review of the quality of reporting of protocol rationale and content validity for using a specific t'ai chi protocol in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods

Electronic literature searches were conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and the Cochrane Library from inception through June 2015. Search terms were Tai Chi, Taiji, Tai Chi Chuan; searches were limited to English-language RCTs. Inclusion and exclusion of trials were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The authors assessed the level of reporting with respect to t'ai chi protocol validation using a 5-point grading system based on whether (1) a specific protocol was mentioned, (2) rationale for the specific protocol was stated and supported, and (3) formal evaluation for content validity was conducted.

Results

There was significant heterogeneity in the quality of reporting related to protocol rationale and content validity. A total of 171 publications were identified. Studies met between 0 and 4 validity criteria (of possible 5, more indicating better quality), with a mean of 2.52 (±SD 1.2) and median of 3. Twenty (12%) trials did not mention a specific t'ai chi protocol, 10 (6%) trials met 0 of 5 criteria, and 47 (31%) studies met 4 of 5 criteria. Formal validity assessments were employed in only one trial.

Conclusions

The poor quality of protocol rationale and content validity reporting limits our ability to accurately evaluate the evidence of t'ai chi as a therapeutic intervention. The development of formal guidelines for developing and reporting intervention validity for multimodal mind-body exercises like t'ai chi may improve the quality and interpretability of research.

SUBMITTER: Litrownik D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6909733 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Reporting of Protocol Rationale and Content Validity in Randomized Clinical Trials of T'ai Chi: A Systematic Evaluation.

Litrownik Daniel D   Gilliam Elizabeth E   Berkowitz Danielle D   Yeh Gloria Y GY   Wayne Peter M PM  

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) 20190305 4


<h4>Background</h4>Mind-body exercise interventions are typically multimodal, complex, and pluralistic, and few have been developed with the goal of therapeutically targeting a specific medical population. It is thus important that clinical trials evaluating mind-body interventions provide some justification for the use of the specific protocol being evaluated.<h4>Objectives</h4>This article reports the results of a systematic review of the quality of reporting of protocol rationale and content  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6855977 | biostudies-literature
2019-06-27 | GSE131398 | GEO
| S-EPMC11544658 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7672868 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5853306 | biostudies-literature
2019-06-27 | GSE131397 | GEO
2019-06-27 | GSE131396 | GEO
| S-EPMC5381792 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5367677 | biostudies-literature