Experimental evidence of subtle victim blame in the absence of explicit blame.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: We argue that people will often eschew explicit victim blame (e.g., claiming that "X is to blame") because it is counternormative and socially undesirable, yet they might still engage in subtle victim blame by attributing victims' suffering to behaviors the victims can control (i.e., "high control causes"). We found support for this argument in three online studies with US residents. In Studies 1 and 2, participants viewed a victim posing either a high threat to the need to believe in a just world, which should heighten the motivation to engage in victim blame, or a low threat. They then rated explicit blame items and attributions for the victim's suffering. Explicit blame was low overall and not influenced by victim threat. However, participants attributed the high threat victim's sufferi
SUBMITTER: Hafer CL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6936882 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA