Communication efficiency of color naming across languages provides a new framework for the evolution of color terms.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Languages vary in their number of color terms. A widely accepted theory proposes that languages evolve, acquiring color terms in a stereotyped sequence. This theory, by Berlin and Kay (BK), is supported by analyzing best exemplars ("focal colors") of basic color terms in the World Color Survey (WCS) of 110 languages. But the instructions of the WCS were complex and the color chips confounded hue and saturation, which likely impacted focal-color selection. In addition, it is now known that even so-called early-stage languages nonetheless have a complete representation of color distributed across the population. These facts undermine the BK theory. Here we revisit the evolution of color terms using original color-naming data obtained with simple instructions in Tsimane', an Amazonian culture
SUBMITTER: Conway BR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6939132 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA