Dataset Information

Approaching Clinical Trials in Childhood Interstitial Lung Disease and Pediatric Pulmonary Fibrosis.

ABSTRACT: Childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD) comprises a spectrum of rare diffuse lung disorders. chILD is heterogeneous in origin, with different disease manifestations occurring in the context of ongoing lung development. The large number of disorders in chILD, in combination with the rarity of each diagnosis, has hampered scientific and clinical progress within the field. Epidemiologic and natural history data are limited. The prognosis varies depending on the etiology, with some forms progressing to lung transplant or death. There are limited treatment options for patients with chILD. Although U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments are now available for adult patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, no clinical trials have been conducted in a pediatric population using agents designed to treat lung fibrosis. This review will focus on progressive chILD disorders and on the urgent need for meaningful objective outcome measures to define, detect, and monitor fibrosis in children.

SUBMITTER: Deterding RR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6945798 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Approaching Clinical Trials in Childhood Interstitial Lung Disease and Pediatric Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Deterding Robin R RR DeBoer Emily M EM Cidon Michal J MJ Robinson Terry E TE Warburton David D Deutsch Gail H GH Young Lisa R LR

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 20191101 10

Childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD) comprises a spectrum of rare diffuse lung disorders. chILD is heterogeneous in origin, with different disease manifestations occurring in the context of ongoing lung development. The large number of disorders in chILD, in combination with the rarity of each diagnosis, has hampered scientific and clinical progress within the field. Epidemiologic and natural history data are limited. The prognosis varies depending on the etiology, with some forms progres ...[more]

PMID: 31322415

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQL) is impaired in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) is a validated measure of HRQL, but no previous studies have focused on the validity of K-BILD in IPF. Moreover, the relationship between K-BILD and dyspnoea or the 6-min walk test (6MWT) has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to validate K-BILD in the largest cohort of patients with IPF to date and assess how K-BILD correlates to dyspnoea and 6MWT.MethodsFirstly, K-BILD was translated into Danish using validated translation procedures. Consecutive patients with IPF were recruited. At baseline, patients completed K-BILD, the IPF-specific version of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) Short Form-36, and pulmonary function tests and 6MWT were performed. After 14 days, K-BILD and Global Rating of Change Scales were completed. Internal consistency, concurrent validity, test-retest reliability and known groups validity were assessed. Analyses were also performed in subgroups of patients with different time since diagnosis.ResultsAt baseline, 150 patients with IPF completed the questionnaires, and 139 patients completed the questionnaires after 14 days. K-BILD had a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92). The concurrent validity was strong compared to SOBQ (r = - 0.66) and moderate compared to 6MWT (r = 0.43). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.91) and a Bland Altman plot demonstrated a good reliability. K-BILD was also able to discriminate between patients with different stages of disease (p < 0.002, Δscore > 7.4) and most results were comparable in patients with different time since diagnosis.ConclusionK-BILD is a valid and reliable instrument in patients with IPF and in patients with different time since diagnosis. To a major extent, K-BILD scores reflected the impact of dyspnoea on HRQL and the impact of physical functional capacity measured by the 6MWT to a moderate degree. Compared to PFTs alone, K-BILD provides additional information on the burden of living with IPF, and importantly, K-BILD is simple to implement in both research and clinical contexts.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.org (NCT02818712) on 30 June 2016.

Project description:BackgroundA number of genetic markers linked to familial pulmonary fibrosis predict differential survival in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. Although genetic testing is not performed routinely for ILD, family history commonly is obtained and may inform outcome risk.Research questionDoes survival vary between patients with and without self-reported familial pulmonary fibrosis?MethodsFamily history was acquired systematically for consecutive ILD patients who consented to clinical registry enrollment at the University of Texas Southwestern and the University of California at Davis. Patients were stratified by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF ILD diagnosis and were substratified by presence or absence of familial pulmonary fibrosis, defined as one or more additional affected family members. Transplant-free survival was compared using multilevel, mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsOf the 1,262 patients included, 534 (42%) had IPF ILD and 728 (58%) had non-IPF ILD. Of those with non-IPF ILD, 18.5% had connective tissue disease, 15.6% had chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and 23.5% had unclassifiable ILD. Familial pulmonary fibrosis was reported in 134 IPF ILD patients (25.1%) and 90 non-IPF ILD patients (12.4%). Those with familial IPF showed an 80% increased risk of death or transplantation compared with those with sporadic IPF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.37-2.37; P < .001), whereas those with familial non-IPF ILD showed a twofold increased risk compared with their counterparts with sporadic disease (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.46-2.96; P < .001). Outcome risk among those with familial non-IPF ILD was no different than for those with sporadic IPF ILD (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.89-1.84; P = .19).InterpretationPatient-reported familial pulmonary fibrosis is predictive of reduced transplant-free survival in IPF and non-IPF ILD patients. Because survival among patients with familial non-IPF ILD approximates that of sporadic IPF ILD, early intervention should be considered for such patients. Until clinical genetic testing is widely available and provides actionable results, family history should be ascertained and considered in risk stratification.

Dataset Information

Approaching Clinical Trials in Childhood Interstitial Lung Disease and Pediatric Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Publications

Approaching Clinical Trials in Childhood Interstitial Lung Disease and Pediatric Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets